Episode 12
Another selection in my occasional looks back at old reviews which I finished by saying something along the lines of “I’ll be looking forward to reading more of her work/this series/his books in the future” to see if I actually did read more and, if I did, did I like the ones I looked forward to as much as the ones that made me look forward to them?
Let’s see then…
Laidlaw by William McIlvanney
First reviewed 24th June 2013. A story of hard men, violent crimes and deep humanity played out on the mean streets of 1970s Glasgow. McIlvanney’s use of language and dialect is brilliant, and his Glasgow is a bleak place, with violence never far beneath the surface, fuelled by drink and prejudice. A place of contradictions, where love exists but doesn’t flourish, where loyalty is a product of fear and betrayal is met with uncompromising brutality. I said “I now fully understand why this book is considered the progenitor of the Tartan Noir genre – I can see it’s influence on so many of the current crop of Scottish crime writers, not to mention the early Taggart series – and I’m duly ashamed that it took me so long to get around to reading it.” Its five glowing stars ensured I’d be looking forward to reading more. But did I?
I certainly did! I started by reading the other two books in the Laidlaw trilogy – The Papers of Tony Veitch and Strange Loyalties, and loved them just as much. I then moved on to McIlvanney’s literary fiction, for which he was perhaps better known in his heyday. I loved Docherty, the story of Tam Docherty, a miner at the beginning of the 20th century, determined that his son would rise out of the poverty of his heritage. The Kiln takes up the story of that original Tam’s grandson, another Tam, in the decades after WW2 – the first generation of his family to go to university. The two books combined are a wonderful study of the struggle of the Scottish working classes to use the twin tools of education and politics to drag themselves out of poverty. His wonderful short story collection, Walking Wounded, set the seal on his place as my favourite modern Scottish writer. I currently have The Big Man waiting on my TBR.
* * * * *
The Square of Revenge by Pieter Aspe
First reviewed 30th June 2013. Commissioner Pieter Van In of the Bruges police is called in to a robbery in a jewellery store, and is stunned to discover that the burglars haven’t stolen anything; instead they have dissolved the jewellery in a vat of aqua regis and left behind a note with a mysterious Latin inscription. This is a fairly light-hearted crime novel, and although I only gave it four stars I said “I certainly found this one enjoyable enough to look out for more in the series when they are translated” But did I?
I did! And I wish I hadn’t! The next and last one I read was The Midas Murders, and I titled my 1-star review “Dull and Derogatory”. I don’t know what happened between the two books but this one was not only tedious and badly written, but also salacious and misogynistic. I offer you one quote that I think will prove my case…
Van In shrugged his shoulders indifferently. The thought of Veronique made him horny. What was he to do? His body reacted to the bitch like a hungry baby to a juicy breast.
Needless to say, Aspe was immediately evicted from my Looking Forward list – ugh! An argument for book-burning.
* * * * *
The Never List by Koethi Zan
First reviewed 3rd July 2013. Darker and more disturbing than my usual crime fare, I nevertheless found this one a real page-turner. It’s about two women, survivors of abduction, imprisonment and abuse, who set out to prove that their abuser is also a murderer. I said “One of the best thrillers I’ve read this year, it’s hard to believe that this is the author’s debut novel. Highly recommended, and I’ll be adding Zan to my ‘must read’ list.” But did I?
I did! Unfortunately her second novel, The Follower, wasn’t nearly as good. It started out well but then lost all pretence at credibility until it eventually became almost farcical at the end. I described the problem as being “too many crazy people with poorly developed motivation”. I gave it what I feel in retrospect was a generous 3 stars and hoped that now she’d got the tricky second novel out of the way she’d get back on track in the next one. But she dropped off my list. That was in 2017, and on checking now, I see she hasn’t published anything since. That’s a pity – I do think she has a lot of talent and practice makes perfect! I hope she hasn’t given up entirely.
* * * * *
After the Lockout by Darran McCann
First reviewed 5th July 2013. Victor Lennon, hero of the failed Easter Uprising of 1916, returns to his home town in Armagh to look after his drunken father at the behest of Stanislaus, the local priest. Through the microcosm of this small town, we are shown the various tensions existing in Irish society at this period – the iron rule of the Catholic church, those who desire independence from the English, those who are fighting alongside those same English in WW1, those who, like Victor, are inspired by the Bolshevik revolution in Russia to bring about a socialist republic. I thought this was a wonderfully written debut from a writer with great potential. I said “A first-rate debut novel which I hope will be followed by many more.” The 5-star rating put him firmly on my list to read his next. But did I?
I didn’t! The reason is simple – there hasn’t been a next one. For a while there was an untitled pre-publication one listed on Amazon but it eventually disappeared, and nothing since. I’m deeply disappointed – I felt he had the potential to become a favourite author. I still keep him on my list and check periodically, but ten years is a long time and eventually I’ll have to give up hope.
* * * * *
Well, that’s a strange and somewhat depressing batch this month! One author who turned into a misogynist and has been banished from my list, and two authors who seem to have given up, both with potential and one at least of whom I felt was destined for a long and glittering literary career. Thank goodness for McIlvanney!