Behind the nom-de-plume…
😀 😀 😀 😀 😀
Vivian Lestrange has become a publishing sensation with his literary mystery novels, especially his most recent smash hit, The Charterhouse Case. He is a recluse, however, refusing to meet journalists or even provide a publicity photograph. Eventually his intrigued publishers persuade him to meet them in person, and to their amazement he turns out to be a young woman! And then Vivian Lestrange disappears…
A very short blurb for this one because it’s so much fun I really don’t want to spoil it by giving too much away. It’s all about noms de plume and authors pretending to be someone other than they are, and the question raised again and again is whether it is possible to determine the sex of an author if all you have to go on is his or her writing. Lorac has her characters muse on whether we would know Dorothy L Sayers was female on the basis of her books alone? Is Conrad’s writing so masculine that no woman could have written his books? I loved this aspect because it’s a question I’ve often mulled, like most readers, I assume. Did anyone ever really believe George Eliot was a man, or do I just feel her books are unmistakeably feminine because I know she’s a woman? More recently, I don’t remember people saying Robert Galbraith’s first book couldn’t have been written by a man, but now that we know that’s a nom de plume for JK Rowling, it seems obvious they come from the pen of a woman. Of course, it has added piquancy because ECR Lorac is a gender neutral nom de plume and I have never been able to find a photograph of her. I know believe she was a woman because Martin Edwards tells me so, but I don’t know that her writing is distinctively feminine – her books are usually low on romance, for example. But then they’re also low on action thrills, often seen as the hallmark of male crime writers in that generation, and largely even still today.
Some of it is done slightly tongue-in-cheek, and I imagine probably reflected Lorac’s own experience within the publishing world. The men who claim that Lestrange’s books couldn’t possibly have been written by a woman clearly think that because the books are so good. How could a woman possibly put herself inside a male character’s head, they ask, dumbfounded, never wondering how male writers manage to think themselves into a female character. How could a mere woman understand so much about the less salubrious side of life, to come up with plots about vicious crimes and criminals? Lorac has other characters who answer those questions from the female perspective – i.e., that men really need to get over themselves and recognise that the days of women being pampered little Dickensian simpletons are long over. (I paraphrase!) Great fun!
The disappearance of Lestrange is investigated by two detectives – the local man, Inspector Bond, and Scotland Yard’s Chief Inspector Warner. They work very well together, although they both hold wildly different theories of what’s happened. Again I have to be vague to avoid spoilers, but Bond believes Lestrange could indeed be a woman while Warner is adamant that the books could have been written only by a man. This means both men are carrying out separate but joined investigations, each trying to prove his own theory but open to the idea that the other man may be in the right. I swayed back and forward all the way through, and wished I could have read Lestrange’s novel to see if I could tell his/her gender for myself!
(Just as an aside, I mentioned a while ago that I now have a subscription for these books, and each month so far a little extra has been included – a bookmark matching the book cover or something like that. This book came with a postcard showing a book cover of Lestrange’s book, The Charterhouse Case, done as a BL Crime Classics book. A lovely touch that made me smile once I realised how it connected to the story.)
The plot itself is convoluted to the point where sometimes I had to read bits again, but it’s very clever and it all works. If I have a criticism it’s that the ending is a bit of an anti-climax, but in this case I enjoyed the journey so much it didn’t bother me. One of the things I love most about Lorac is her unpredictability – she’s not afraid to try different things and often comes at her stories from an unusual angle. This one is delightfully different to her MacDonald books, and I loved it. I sound like a stuck record when it come to Lorac but… highly recommended!
NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, the British Library.
Well, this sounds delightful, and I’m always pleased to hear that there’s another Lorac that’s been republished! Your mention of George Eliot made me laugh though. My dad didn’t know that was a pseudonym and once gave me a long, misogynistic lecture about how Eliot’s work (and Middlemarch in particular) proved that truly great works of genius can only be written by men… it was very satisfying to eventually clue him in after he’d spent several minutes explaining how uniquely male and wonderful Eliot’s work is!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Hahaha, poor dad! I wish you’d had your camera ready to capture his expression! 😂This one’s a lot of fun, and quite different to her Inspector MacDonald books. But now I can’t help wondering if the reason there are no photos of her is that really she was a man hiding behind a nom de plume…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been wanting to read this anyway, FictionFan, and your review just makes me want to all the more. The context – the writing and publishing world – is so appealing, and the whole question of the way men and women write is really interesting. So is the choice of author name. And with Lorac’s wit, I can certainly see the appeal!
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a proper crime at the centre of this, but really the heart of it is all the stuff about writing and noms de plume – so much fun! And has left me wondering if the reason there are no photos of Lorac is that she was really a man hiding behind a pseudonym! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s such a lovely inclusion for the fictional novel to have a BLCC cover! ECR Lorac is someone I keep meaning to read as there’s so much love in the blogosphere for her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The little extras have been so much fun so far, with nearly every one relating to the book in some way. The next one, which I haven’t read yet, has a pair of cardboard specs with magnifying lenses – can’t wait to find out how that relates to the book! You really must try Lorac – she’s been such a wonderful discovery for the BL!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This sounds great! And as someone whose writing is partially under a pen name, this seems a must-read! 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, well, if I find out after all this time that you’re really a man, I shall faint! It’s funny how we make assumptions based on authors’ names, though, and this book has a lot of fun with the idea… 😀
LikeLike
I’ve seen so much appreciation for Lorac on a variety of blogs – I’ll be recommending her to my crime fiction-loving partner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do! She’s been such a wonderful find for the BL – the real star of the show! And there’s such variety in her books – no formulas for her! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
How perfectly wonderful to end the week on such a high note! This one sounds really intriguing. I suspect we all carry certain little prejudices when it comes to the sex of an author. I’m not sure it should matter whether an author is male or female, but readers can’t help pondering it (and writers can’t help giving tiny glimpses into their inner core!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
ECR Lorac is always a guaranteed winner for me! Yes, it’s funny how we make assumptions based on authors’ names, and then think that we can tell that they’re male or female accordingly. And yet, so many authors have written under pseudonyms that we should really know better! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you enjoyed this, I have it waiting in the wings 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m almost guaranteed to love a Lorac – she’s such a star! Hope you enjoy this one as much as I did! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t been disappointed so far 🤞
LikeLiked by 1 person
Still can’t understand how such a good writer came to be forgotten!
LikeLiked by 1 person
How fun the bookish extra you get with your subscription! This one sounds like a winner!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The little extras have been such fun so far, usually with some connection to the book they arrive with. The next book, which I haven’t read yet, came with a little pair of cardboard spectacle with magnifying lenses – can’t wait to see how they connect to the story! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
This sounds very good; and a question which is indeed something I’ve wondered about too. The Brontes; Eliot; or as you note, even Galbraith/Rowling and Lorac herself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I’ve often wondered how much authors’ names influence us in all sorts of ways, but especially when it comes to gender. It would be fun to read some of the greats without knowing who wrote them to see if we a) thought they were great if we hadn’t been told in advance that they were and b) could tell what gender they were!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That would be an interesting experiment to try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hard to organise though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m such a sucker for packaging you’re going to get me signed up for the subscription now! This one sounds great and it’s a very good question, why do I think Lorac is a women? Well she has a depth to her surroundings and characters and patience with them, she’s too good not to be a woman!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The little extras have been such fun so far, usually with some connection to the book they arrive with. The next book, which I haven’t read yet, came with a little pair of cardboard spectacle with magnifying lenses – can’t wait to see how they connect to the story! 😀 Haha, excellent reason, and I shall go along with it! I’ve never previously doubted she was a woman but is that just because Martin Edwards told me she was? Is the reason there’s no photo of her that she’s really a man hiding behind a pseudonym??
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, yes, an ongoing discussion in the publishing world. I do think that if one came across Hemingway’s work without knowing who the author was, they would immediately default to male. But getting back to Patricia Highsmith…one would be hardpressed, I think, to decide if her books were written by a man or woman.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I think the way Hemingway treats his female characters would be a giveaway, and Austen, I feel, is unmistakeably female since all her main characters are and it’s always the female perspective she chooses. But lots of them would be much harder to tell, I think. I’ve read a couple of initialled crime writers and later discovered I’ve “misgendered” them in my mind… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
This sounds good!! I’ve only read one of HER books so far, but really need to get to the others I have in my TBR. (and I believe this one will have to be added, as well)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, but is she a HER??? I only have Martin Edwards’ word for it, and can he be trusted?? Is the reason there’s no photo of her that she’s really a man hiding behind a pseudonym? We can never be sure… 😉 Yes, this one is definitely worthy of a spot on your list! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wikipedia says she’s a HER, too. (And includes a photo as a child). I trust Martin Edwards and wiki!
LikeLiked by 1 person
She didn’t used to be on wiki till the BL started re-printing her, so I’m willing to bet that the info on wiki is taken from Martin Edwards’ intros. It could easily all be a conspiracy… where’s my tin-foil hat?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well a good conspiracy is always fun!! 🤪
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t enjoy this quite as much as you did, but it was my first Lorac and I think I should have tried a different one first. I agree that it would have been good to read Lestrange’s novel and make our own mind up!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s different in style from her series books and I think I enjoyed it more because I already love her and had fun seeing her try something different, but I agree it’s probably not the best one to start with. That’s always the problem when a fictional book is mentioned – I always want to read it! And having the BL book cover for it made it even more tempting… 😉
LikeLike
Sounds fab!
I always think books by ‘Anonymous’ are by a female writer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm, interesting! And quite likely, since women writing books was often frowned on. Didn’t Austen publish her first one anonymously? I think I’d definitely have known it was written by a woman though… I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed, Austen’s books always seem feminine to me too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was sure that the police (spoiler) had the brothers mixed up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, by that stage I was so confused I was willing to believe anything… or nothing! 😉
LikeLike
I have only read one book by Lorac, but I am glad that the British Library is putting out so many and I look forward to reading them someday.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s been the real shining star of the British Library series for me, and she’s become one of my favourite authors now. I’m always thrilled when I see another of her books appearing on their list. 😀
LikeLike
A fascinating post! Death of an Author is on my wish list and reading your post has made me bump it up the list. I wonder what evidence Martin Edwards found that Lorac was a woman?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, I know – I now want to go back to the first Lorac they published and re-read his introduction. As far as I remember, she had no children either, so no descendants. It all seems very suspicious… and there’s nothing more fun than a good conspiracy theory! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
This one does sound delightful, and you know I love a book that pokes fun at publishing in general! Very neat that this is a subscription too, you’ll have to include a photo or two of some of the little gifts they are sending you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha, I did think about taking a pic of the postcard for the blog, but I’m the only person left in the world without a smart phone and my camera is never charged, so photos just don’t happen! But the freebies with the subscription have been a nice little touch of fun… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
That does sound fun, and good for you for holding out on getting a smart phone. I will say though, my 99 year old grandfather has a smart phone and he loves it! So never too late to change your mind haha
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, maybe I’ll wait till I’m 99 and get one then! 😉 I actually keep meaning to, but honestly it drives me up the wall when everyone is glued to their phones all the time… and I know I would be too!
LikeLike
I was hoping to havee her book with the Classics spin. I didn’t, but am planning to try this author very soon. She wrote so much, I’m really intrigued
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s been the major star of the British Library series as far as I’m concerned. I just don’t understand how someone so talented managed to become “forgotten”!
LikeLiked by 1 person
These days I pretty much assume Anon and initials are women writers (and artists). And there really is a picture of the writer as an adult woman online… As always I’m looking forward to any new Lorac that comes out!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. Rose said that too in an earlier comment. I must say I don’t always think that, though I’m sure it’s often the case. But I think that especially with short stories that get resurrected from old periodicals, it’s often just that the name of the author wasn’t considered important enough to record. I think you’ll enjoy this Lorac when you get to it – she has a lot of fun with the subject!
LikeLike
I’ve just read this and really enjoyed it. As you say she was poking fun I think at the publishing world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s so good, and I love that she sometimes goes away from her series novels and comes up with something a bit quirky like this one. I still can’t understand why such a good writer managed to become “forgotten”!
LikeLike
This sounds fun! It’s an interesting question – can you tell someone’s gender from their writing? I’m inclined to say no…except if a book seems to have a lot of focus on the breasts of its female characters. Then it’s always by a man!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha, excellent point! And in reverse I think it’s safe to say that swooning over chocolatey-brown eyes is usually the preserve of women!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha! That’s probably true!
LikeLiked by 1 person