In a Lonely Place by Dorothy B. Hughes

Paranoia…

😀 😀 😀 😀

Our narrator, Dix Steele, has moved from New Jersey to Los Angeles, where he plans to write a mystery novel. Or at least that’s what he told his uncle, who has grudgingly agreed to pay him a small allowance for a year while he tries his hand at writing. He tells the same tale to Brub Nicolai, a wartime buddy with whom he renews his friendship, and Brub’s new wife, Sylvia. But Dix has a dark secret – he likes to strangle young women. And Brub has a new career, as a police detective…

Told in the first person, this is a psychological study of what we would now call a serial killer. This has been done many times in the years since 1947 when this was first published, of course, so a trip to the inside of the head of a psychopath isn’t as startling as it may have been at the time. The gruesomeness of the murders is mostly kept off the page, and Hughes also keeps it clean – there are hints at a sexual element to the crimes, but we are not made privy to the details. All of this means that, although it probably counts as noir in terms of subject matter and outcome, it feels considerably lighter than the little classic noir I’ve previously read. Not that I’m objecting to that – a lot of noir is far too grim and bleak for my taste, and I’m always happier when graphic sex and violence is left to the imagination.

What I objected to rather more was the incredibly slow pace of the first half of the novel. We very quickly learn that Dix is a killer, and that L.A. is gripped by this series of murders. We see the fear of the women, and of their men on their behalf. And through Brub we see the bafflement of the police, getting nowhere in their investigation and unable to predict where and when the next murder will happen. All of this is excellent, but then it dips into a sort of longueur where these things are gone over repeatedly and nothing much changes. I found it required an effort of will to keep going.

Book 13 of 80

However, it picks up considerably in the second half, and happily I at last found myself gripped. Dix falls for a beautiful dame, Laurel, a sultry, sexy feline in female form. Is she a femme fatale? Or is she destined to be another victim? Is she a temptress, a loose woman, or a forerunner of the sexually liberated women about to hit the scene? Dix thinks he sees her for what she is and believes they are destined for one another, but is that how Laurel sees it? Is Sylvia in danger? We like Sylvia – she’s all that is good about America, according to the values of the time; the feminine woman, attractive but not too corruptingly sexy, the respectable home-maker, the loving support to her husband, the little woman who needs protection. Though there might be more to her than that – we see her only through Dix’s unreliable eyes, and he gradually comes to fear that she may have seen through his outer shell.

Dorothy B. Hughes

Hughes does an excellent job of using the uncertainty in Dix’s mind to keep the reader in suspense too. Does Brub suspect Dix of being the killer, or is that just Dix’s increasing paranoia at work? As Dix’s fear of being caught grows, everything that happens begins to take on a sinister feel. Is the gardener outside really a gardener or is he a police spy? Is that car following Dix or is it just someone heading in the same direction? Dix thinks he’s clever enough to fool Brub and anyone else who might suspect him, but still his actions grow more erratic. The paranoia is the element that makes the second half work so well.

I’m unconvinced about the psychology hinted at as to why Dix became a serial killer, although that may be because we are more used these days to the idea of serial killings as being senseless, motiveless crimes. However, I felt it worked well in the context of the book (sorry, I know I’m being vague here – it’s deliberate to avoid spoilers).

Overall, the suspense of the second half made up for the slowness of the first half and I’m glad I didn’t give up on it. Now to watch the film version starring Humphrey Bogart and Gloria Grahame – I get the impression it might be rather different from the book which is always fun…

Book 1 of 12

This was the People’s Choice for January (I’m running late!), and proved to be an enjoyable one – thanks, People!

Amazon UK Link

30 thoughts on “In a Lonely Place by Dorothy B. Hughes

  1. oh, ye of infinite patience! I’m glad there was a payoff at the end, but I’m afraid I wouldn’t have slogged much past the beginning if it felt like it wasn’t going anywhere. I’ve probably missed out on many good books this way, but I read too slowly to allow for much dawdling. Kudos to your patience. For psychological thrillers, I’m a fan of Patricia Highsmith. She hasn’t bored me.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I have a tendency to stick with books that are for one of my challenges longer than I might for other books, when they get a bit long winded in the early stages! But this one turned out to be worth continuing with, and I would be happy to try some of her other books. I’ve only read one Patricia Highsmith, Strangers on a Train – I really must read more…

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m glad it paid off in the end, or rather before then. I much prefer violence left for the reader to infer rather than graphically described which also goes for TV crime. I’ve become warier of Scandi crime over the years I’ve been watching Walter Presents as it’s become more graphic.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, the lack of graphic violence, and graphic sex for that matter, is why I increasingly find I enjoy older books more than contemporary crime novels. This one turned out to be well worth sticking with in the end, so I’m glad I didn’t abruptly throw it onto the abandoned pile!

      Liked by 1 person

    • I watched the film after I had written this review, and it is so different that if it hadn’t had the same title it would have been quite hard to tell that they were supposed to be the same thing! Film review to follow… 😀

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m glad you enjoyed this in the end! I really loved it and it didn’t drag for me – I think I found that long section at the start tense rather than slow, but I agree it was probably longer than it needed to be. The film is on my list too!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I seem to be increasingly impatient with books that get off to a slow start these days. I loved the very beginning when she did all the set-up and agree that was very tense. It was really after that that I felt that it sank into a kind of repetition for a while. But I enjoyed the end enough that I was glad I’d stuck it out! I watched the film after I’d written the review and it’s really well worth making the time for. Film review to follow… 😀

      Liked by 1 person

  4. It is interesting to read books from the past like that, and know that they were considered ‘edgy’ at the time. The premise sounds great, FictionFan, and I’m glad the pace picked up for you in the second half of the story. And what would a noir (quasi-noir?) story be without an enigmatic temptress…

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, I often have to remind myself that sometimes something that might feel a bit clichéd now would have been original or near enough back when it was first published. The second half of this one is well worth sticking with it through the rather over long middle section – she does paranoia so well! And I thought Laurel was a beautifully ambiguous femme fatale…

      Liked by 1 person

    • I must admit I’m getting less patient with every year that passes, and abandon far more books now than I used to – probably too many! But when it’s a People’s Choice book, I feel obligated to give it a good try at the very least. 😉 And in this case it worked out well since the second half was really very good.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I thought it seemed tailor made to be adapted into a film starring Bogart or Fred McMurray, so I’m glad madamebibliophile mentioned that it was a movie. I admire the fact that you persevered. I probably would not have finished it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I watched the movie after I’d written this review, and it really is a great performance from Bogart. But they’ve changed the plot so much that if it didn’t have the same title it would have been quite hard to know that they were supposed to be the same thing!;)

      Like

  6. I can’t remember whether I voted for this one, but I’m glad it (finally!) lived up to your high expectations. Now you’ve got me wondering — just how many slow-starting novels have I tossed aside in anger when, if I’d continued to read them, they might have redeemed themselves in the end?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m sure I abandon too many books these days and probably miss out on a lot that have a great second half! That’s why I quite often flick forward to the end if I’m thinking about abandoning a book, and if it looks as if the end is exciting it sometimes encourages me to go back and struggle on. Sometimes… 😉

      Like

  7. I do like the sound of this, noir light is definitely me! And you stuck with it so there must have been something there to keep you going, but thanks for the warning (although I feel much more able to skip and gloss over pages these days!)

    Liked by 1 person

    • I prefer lighter noir too – the really grim and gruesome stuff just doesn’t work for me. The second half of this one is definitely good enough to make it worth struggling through that rather overlong middle section, so I’m glad I did. I think I probably abandon too many books at too early a stage these days. My patience is definitely wearing thinner with every year… 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  8. I’ve not read it nor seen the film. I’m glad sticking with it paid off for you! I hate giving up on a book, so it’s always nice when tenacity is rewarded.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m always more likely to stick it out with a challenge book, especially a People’s Choice book – I feel obligated somehow! 😉 In this case it was worth it, though, and I must say the film was great – I watched it after I’d written this review. Film review to follow… 😀

      Liked by 1 person

  9. I’m glad you enjoyed this, eventually! I can’t remember finding it slow, but it seems you made the right choice in persevering. I’ve read a few of Hughes’ novels now – I think The Expendable Man was my favourite, but Ride the Pink Horse was a good one as well.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m finding an awful lot of books slow these past few months, so I’m sure it’s me as much as the books. I don’t seem to have the same level of patience as I used to! However I enjoyed the second half of this one so much that I was glad I had stuck with it in those early stages. I’d be happy to read more by her so thanks for those recommendations – I shall check them out! 😀

      Like

  10. Yes, the movie is definitely different from the book. You think they’d make Humphrey Bogart a serial killer? I think I didn’t mind the slow start as much as you did. I also liked the woman power ending.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I like these noir novels of this era mainly because so many of them have been made into great films, all starring wonderful people like Humphrey Bogart! The book isn’t really terribly long so that slow first half is bearable, and the second-half really is worth the effort.

      Liked by 1 person

Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.