Toil and trouble…
😀 😀 😀 😀
The people who attend the funeral of Larry Glassbrook, dead after spending many years in prison for the murders of several teenagers, aren’t there to mourn so much as to assure themselves he is really dead. Florence Lovelady is one. Now a senior police officer, back then she was a raw WPC who was responsible for bringing Larry to justice, at great cost to herself. But when she visits the house Larry used to live in, she finds something that makes her realise that the story of the murders isn’t over yet…
This is told in two timelines, starting in 1999 (which in terms of the book is the present day), then going back to 1969 when the murders were happening, and then coming back to the present for the last section. The “present” sections are given in the present tense, while the “past” sections are in past tense, so at least there’s slightly more logic to the use of the present tense than many times when it’s used, but it’s still annoying. However, Bolton is such a good writer she can carry it off if anyone can. All sections are first person accounts from Florence.
The setting is the village of Sabden, nestling at the foot of Pendle Hill in Lancashire, famed for being the site of the infamous witch trial in the 17th century. Bolton uses this historical event as a starting point to bring the idea of witchcraft and the supernatural into her story, and to explore the idea of modern witchcraft. If, like me, you don’t believe in the power of crystals and the magical uses of herbs and so on, you will have to be willing to suspend your disbelief at points. Fortunately it doesn’t play a large part in most of the story and Bolton is very good at leaving it ambiguous enough for the rationalists among us to justify all that happens rationally – for the most part. And it creates a deliciously creepy atmosphere, with a growing sense of dread and some real cliff-hanger moments that make reading the next chapter essential!
The 1969 part of the story is excellent. Three teenagers have gone missing, separately, about a month between each disappearance. Tensions are rising in the town at the police’s failure to find either the children or their abductor, and the police are at a loss. Graduate Florence brings with her new-fangled ideas about analysing data to spot patterns and so on, and is rubbing up her colleagues the wrong way. Combined with the usual sexism of the period, this means she has to battle hard to have her voice and her ideas heard. (FF delicately stifles a yawn.) But she’s a determined type, and even her bosses soon have to admit that sometimes her suggestions make sense. And then she finds one of the teenagers, dead unfortunately, and the missing persons case becomes a hunt for a murderer.

The 1999 sections are considerably less successful in my opinion, with Florence behaving in ways that I found hard to believe any senior police officer would. The woo-woo-witchcraft element is also stronger here, especially in the last section. While the story remains compelling and full of atmosphere, the credibility falls away sharply, and I shall draw a kind veil over the last couple of ludicrous chapters, which had they not happened at the very end would probably have led to me abandoning the book.
So overall I loved about 97% of this and thought the ending was silly, hence the loss of a star. If you’re happy with nonsense – sorry, I mean, magic – in your crime novels, you probably won’t have the same issue. I haven’t decided yet whether to read the next book, The Buried, which has just been released – while I enjoyed Florence as a character and loved the setting and atmosphere, I’ll wait for other reviews to give me an idea of whether it returns to real life or remains in the world of potions and spells…
Hmm, I’m on the fence about this one…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t let me put you off! You know what I’m like about supernatural woo-woo drifting into crime, but honestly apart from that aspect it’s well worth reading.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I have enjoyed her books previously…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Then you’ll probably enjoy this!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s so often the trouble with dual narratives! If you make one of your timelines too fascinating then the reader kind of resents returning to the other.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m really not a fan of dual narratives for that very reason. I wish we could get back to books sticking to one timeline.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bolton is a good enough writer, FictionFan, that she can get away with the uses of the two tenses. And I don’t say that lightly, as I generally cannot enjoy a book written in the present tense. And I can see how the premise could be really intriguing. It sounds, too, as though the characters are solidly done, as Bolton does so well. I’m not much of a one for an unrealistic ending, etc., but it does sound like a solid, engaging read overall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At least she used the present tense for the present. I remember reading a book with a dual timeline once where the author had used past tense for the present and present tense for the past. That just seemed to be pouring salt in the wound! Definitely a good read, but you know how much I object to the insertion of supernatural woo-woo into crime – I’m sure people who tolerate that better would love this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So is the book has a magical realism element to it? While I enjoy fantasy books, I don’t like an abrupt genre switch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
More like outright magic, I’d say, the suggestion being that witches really can do spells. It’s putting supernatural stuff in crime fiction that annoys me, too – fantasy is fine and so are ghostly horror novels. But crime should be about realism, I feel…
LikeLike
Probably not one I’ll actively seek out, based on your review — though I’m sure the parts you enjoyed would be ones I’d like, too. Sometimes contrasting decades in a story work well, but I definitely don’t like silly endings, ha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m tired of dual timelines and would love to see more books set in a single time period again. And keep supernatural woo-woo for fantasy and horror, I say! Crime should be realistic! *stomps off, huffily*
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm, I read that novel a while back, and I didn’t even remember the witchcraft part of it, so I guess it wasn’t the biggest part of the book for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But half the characters are witches! And the ending! I didn’t mind the witchcraft element until she decided to reveal that witches really do have magical powers…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t remember any of it, I guess, except the beginning. Oh, didn’t the main character find out her mother was a witch or something?
LikeLiked by 1 person
She kinda discovered there was a legend that Pendle women became witches if they skinny-dipped in a pool. So she did! And suddenly she developed magical powers! Haha, it sounded better in the book… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, right!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pendle, Salem – it seems that some writers feel unable to write a witchcraft novel without bringing in infamous sites like these, but it just seems lazy to me. And crystals and such leave me cold – not in any physical or mystical sense but figuratively. But then I’m unlikely to be the target audience!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I get tired of it too – so overused. In her defence, apparently she grew up in Pendle and was trying to bring the local traditions into the book. But still, I could very much have done without her suddenly revealing that witches do have magical powers! Keep supernatural stuff for fantasy and horror, I say!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I sometimes think I’m more okay with real fantasy than books that just try to weave elements of it into a story. Even though I’m skeptical of the woo-woo stuff, I do think herbs truly can heal. Lots of modern medicines have their basis in them!
I’d be willing to give this one a chance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, absolutely. I’m not much of a fantasy fan as you know but I’m quite happy about supernatural stuff in horror. But I feel crime fiction should be based in the real world, unless it’s clearly a fantasy world if you know what I mean. Ha, yes, I believe herbs and oils have therapeutic properties too, but not magical ones which is what she was suggesting here!
Loads of people have loved it, and I did too, with just that reservation about woo-woo, so go for it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This will remain on my list but it’s good to know what I’m getting myself into… I’m good with a little paranormal usually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If the supernatural aspects don’t bother you then I think you’d love this! I did too, with just that reservation – I really feel woo-woo should be kept for fantasy or horror writing… *stomps off, huffily*
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoyed this, but I know what you mean about the last few chapters! I read The Buried when it came out last year and found it quite similar to this one – a very strong 1960s story, which I loved, but some supernatural elements in the modern day one. If you do decide to read it, I would recommend not waiting too long as it had been three or four years for me and it does continue some of the storylines from the first book, which I’d completely forgotten!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those last chapters blew my credibility meter up! I still haven’t decided about The Buried, but I’ll take your advice and make a decision sooner rather than later. Maybe the woo-woo wouldn’t bother me so much if I was expecting it. Or maybe it would!
LikeLike
I will skip this one. I wouldn’t be able to overcome my scepticism over the healing power of crystals.
Do you think it might be possible for an author to write a novel that doesn’t use more than one time frame?? It seems nearly every book I pick up now has to use that approach
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am so tired of dual timelines now – I wish this fad would pass and let us get back to straightforward storytelling. Yes, I can cope with the supernatural in fantasy or horror, but I don’t expect it in crime novels!
LikeLike
It’s so difficult to pull off a well-done dual timeline, and when it works I find it especially interesting, and really admire the author who can carry it off!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sharon Bolton is such a good writer she can often reconcile me to things that are general no-nos for me, like dual timelines, or present tense. But even she couldn’t quite reconcile me to magical witches!
LikeLike
I don’t mind a little woo-woo witchcraft here and there, so I can imagine myself liking this one, but I do get a bit squeamish when reading about serial killers who target kids (even teens). Now that I’m a mother, I find it really emotionally taxing to read stuff like that, but sometimes its unavoidable in our book reviewer line of business 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think in this one it helped that the teen murders were so long in the past and we didn’t get to know them as people, but I must say there were some fairly gruesome moments! If the witchcraft doesn’t bother you, then you might love it – it’s got a million glowing reviews, and she’s such a good writer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had to laugh (I’m sorry) when you decided to draw a veil over the last couple of chapters. I don’t think it erased them from your memory, sadly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, sadly not! It was all going so well up till then too! However, it has a million five star reviews, so I accept my allergy to woo-woo is mostly to blame… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not against magic in a novel generally, but not a crime novel, which is probably unfair of me! It feels like cheating!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m exactly the same – in fiction magic can be worked in well, and in fantasy of course, but not in crime fiction! If the police could do magic then wouldn’t that be scary!!
LikeLiked by 1 person