A Bunch of Minis…
I’m still battling to catch up with reviews, so here’s another little batch of mini-reviews of books that were mostly middling…
* * * * *
Max Carrados by Ernest Bramah
🙂 🙂 🙂
A collection of short stories about amateur detective Max Carrados, whose blindness has allowed him to develop all his other senses way beyond the norm, and also well beyond the limits of believability. The stories are well written and some of the plots are interesting, though others are pretty dull, but I tired very quickly of Carrados’ superhuman sensory abilities, such as being able to date an ancient coin by touch alone. There seemed to be something of a fad for detectives with disabilities round about that period – the book was published in 1914 – though sadly not in the sense of creating visibility or understanding for people with disabilities, but rather as a form of entertainment for able-bodied people to wonder over. However, it wasn’t the absence of political correctness that prevented me enjoying the book wholeheartedly – that is of its time and Bramah certainly doesn’t disparage his hero. It was simply that I felt Bramah took the concept too far, making it impossible for me to believe in Carrados’ abilities. The stories I enjoyed best were the ones that relied least on the fact of Carrados being blind. Worth a read, though – I certainly found them more enjoyable than some of the books from this very early period of mystery writing.
Challenge details:
Book: 11
Subject Heading: A New Era Dawns
Publication Year: 1914
* * * * *
Israel Rank by Roy Horniman
😐 😐
This is the book on which the famous film Kind Hearts and Coronets was based so the story will be familiar to anyone who has seen it, although apparently the film had some significant differences to the book. Basically, the narrator in the book, Israel Rank, is the son of a Jewish father and a mother who is distantly related to Earl Gascoyne. Israel finds out that there are eight people in the line of succession between him and the Earldom, and sets out to bump them off one by one. It’s a long time since I watched the film but my recollection is it’s mainly played for laughs. The book attempts black humour too, but for me it didn’t really come off. As well as being a multiple murderer, Israel is a snob, completely convinced of his own superiority, and spends far too much time telling us his lustful thoughts about the various women with whom he gets involved. I found the murders too cruel to be humorous – there is real grief on the part of the victims’ relatives.
There is also an insistence on Jewish stereotyping, with Israel frequently referring to the ‘traits’ of ‘his people’ while trotting out some hackneyed anti-Semitic trope. Martin Edwards suggests, based on what is known of Horniman’s life, that the book is probably intended “as a condemnation of anti-Semitism, rather than some form of endorsement of it” but, while I’m happy to accept that he’s probably right, I’m afraid that’s not how it comes over. I found Israel too unpleasant to like, and certainly had no desire to see him succeed in his aims.
However, all of that I could probably have tolerated – again, it’s of its time – but I fear I also found it rather dull and massively overlong. I gave up about halfway through and jumped to the end to see if he succeeded. I won’t tell you if he did, but I found the ending unsatisfying enough that I was glad I hadn’t ploughed through the second half waiting for it.
Challenge details:
Book: 5
Subject Heading: A New Era Dawns
Publication Year: 1907
* * * * *
Arms and the Women (Dalziel and Pascoe 18) by Reginald Hill
😀 😀 😀 🙂
After the events of the previous book, Ellie Pascoe is indulging in some self-prescribed therapy by writing a never-to-be-published story about the Greeks and Trojans, starring a version of Odysseus who bears a remarkable resemblance to Andy Dalziel. Then two strangers arrive at her door one afternoon and attempt to abduct her. While the police try to find out what’s going on, Ellie agrees to make herself scarce for a bit, and retreats to an isolated house by the sea, owned by her friend Daphne Alderman who accompanies her. DC Shirley Novello, “Ivor” as Dalziel calls her, is sent along as protection, and Ellie takes her young daughter, Rosie. This group is enlarged by the inclusion of a neighbour of Daphne’s – Feenie McCallum, an elderly lady with a mysterious past. Naturally the baddies will find them, and the women will have to protect themselves and each other while waiting for the cavalry, in the persons of Dalziel and Pascoe, to ride to the rescue.
By this late stage in the series Hill is trying new things in each book, which sometimes work and sometimes don’t quite. Here he plays with Ellie’s re-writing of the story of Odysseus and there are large sections of her manuscript interspersed throughout the main story. While these are well written and quite fun, they simply get in the way of the plot, making the book overlong and slowing it down to a crawl. Also he decides to concentrate almost entirely on the women, as the title implies, meaning that Dalziel, Pascoe and Wield are relegated to the sidelines and barely appear. Since those are the three characters who hold the series together this was a brave choice, but from my perspective not a good one. The plot is desperately convoluted too, and goes so far over the credibility line it nearly disappears over the horizon. Lastly, as I’ve mentioned before, I find it irritating that Pascoe has to deal with a family-related trauma in nearly every book at this later stage in the series.
As always with Hill, the writing is a joy, and there’s plenty of humour along with some tense, exciting scenes, so it’s still very readable. But it’s one of my least favourites and I’d really only recommend it to Dalziel and Pascoe completists.
* * * * *
I really enjoyed Kind Hearts and Coronets when I watched it last year, but I think I’ll skip the book! I remember reading that the reason they changed the central character to be half-Italian rather than Jewish in the film is that, by 1949, the source material appeared very anti-Semitic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s so long since I saw the film I only have the vaguest memory of it now, but it seems to me they improved the story in lots of ways. The anti-Semitic stuff is pretty off-putting even for that time, and I found it hard to see it as satire. The same applied to the murders – they were too cruel to be entertaining.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few more done and dusted…😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, sometimes short reviews work better for these middling books!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s the thing, FictionFan, in my opinion at least: Hill at his weakest is still better than lots of people at their best. Even when things don’t work quite well, there’s always something in a Hill book to keep the reader’s interest and make it worth the reading. And thanks for reminding me of Kind Hearts and Coronets – it had been a while…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, indeed, it’s like Dickens or Christie – even when I’m critical of a Hill novel, it’s only in comparison to other Hill novels. Even the less good ones are good! It’s years since I saw Kind Hearts and Coronets and though I didn’t enjoy the book, it’s made me want to watch the film again…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. A mixed bag. But I agree with Margot. Even a middling Hill is better than the best attempts of many authors.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it’s like Christie or Dickens – even when I’m criticising a Hill novel, it’s only in comparison to other Hill novels. Even his less good ones are good!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought about reading Israel Rank a while ago but saw some other reviews that mentioned the anti-Semitism and unpleasant main character so I didn’t bother. It sounds as though that was the right decision!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s definitely not one I’d recommend. While usually I can put up with outdated attitudes in older books, the anti-Semitism in this one is hard to overlook, and Israel is a really unpleasant character. I think I’ll re-watch the film instead!
LikeLike
Good that you got these read and out of the way, even if they got a bit of a short shrift. I’m not tempted. I hope what you currently have going is much better!
LikeLiked by 1 person
These middling books are always a pain to review so I’m getting in to the swing of lumping them all together. From a review-writing perspective, I’d rather hate a book than think it’s just OK!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You certainly have fun with your negative reviews (and provide us great entertainment!). 😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, well, I’ve got to get rid of my bitterness somehow! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice to get these out of the way. Can’t say as I’m tempted, but your reviews always are interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Debbie! Yes, these middling books are always a pain to review, so I’m getting into the habit of lumping them together in one post to get them out of the way!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like Hill at least attempted to do some different things rather than rehashing the same story over and over again … but not a satisfying set of reads really! I just had to skim one as it repeated stuff I’ve already read three times in rather overlapping ways …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, that was part of what made Hill so special, but it did also mean that a few of the books were less successful. I guess when you read as much as us books are bound to overlap form time to time, but it’s still annoying when it happens.
LikeLike
Well, relieved that I can say that none of these appeal to me. Onward!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always like to give your TBR a holiday from time to time… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will read Arms and the Women in its turn (next up for me is #16), but I’m now warned! Thank goodness Hill is such a good writer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which one counts as #16 on the list you’re following. Audible considers it to be Asking for the Moon, which I don’t really consider to be a series book – it always felt to me more like a little present from Hill to his readers. Great fun, though! I decided I’d leave it to the end this time through, since it jumps about in time. #17 on my list is On Beulah Height, which is wonderful… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I had seen #16 Asking for the Moon was a ‘shorts’ book. On Beulah Height is my next novel and I’m really looking forward after seeing your enthusiasm for it! A big thanks to you for prompting me to read this very satisfying and enjoyable series.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I take it you’ve read Pictures of Perfection then? (Sorry if you’ve already told me – my memory’s shocking!) I must say that, although it couldn’t be much more different than On Beulah Height, this time round I loved it about equally.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I have read Pictures of Perfection. It was a real joy to read (despite mayhem and threats) and such an unexpectedly refreshing ending. I really felt in the hands of a master storyteller and writer throughout.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, that prologue and ending are really masterful! I always end up going straight back to the beginning just to admire how he does the prologue all over again! So glad you’re enjoying him! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, I did that too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never quite cottoned on to the Max Carrados stories with those superhuman qualities either. Hmm, that Hill isn’t one that sounds familiar, I did skip around in his later books though. I got a little tired of hearing about the Pascoe marriage after a while.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never like the way people with disabilities used to be given special compensatory powers back in those days, partly because it seems so patronising but mostly because it’s just so incredible! Yes, unfortunately Hill clearly felt Pascoe was his central character, whereas I always preferred Fat Andy and Wieldy. I wish he’d included Wieldy’s partner in more of the later books – I loved them as an odd couple. Still, while the later books can be a bit too quirky for my taste, his writing and humour always carry me through.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find the middling books the hardest to review. The bunch of minis is a good idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I find it harder and harder to find anything interesting to say about the three star books – mini-reviews may become a regular thing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too bad those first too were a bit disappointing. I must say the superhuman abilities of that detective do sound too good to be true (dating an old coin by touch? My gosh people who can see perfectly fine still take weeks to do that!). I never saw (or heard) of that second book and it’s accompanying film, but turns out I’m not missing much 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, the idea that he would have developed such amazing powers made it impossible for me to really buy into him as a character. Haha, the film, Kind Hearts and Coronets, is a classic and much better than the book, though I imagine it’s pretty dated now – it’s decades since I watched it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like Kind Hearts and Coronets but I think I can safely give the book a miss – thank you for alerting me!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely a case of the film being better than the book with this one!
LikeLiked by 1 person