Money makes the world go around…
😀 😀 😀 😀 😀
This is the story of a power couple in New York, in the years leading up to and following the Great Crash of 1929. He is Benjamin Rask, a financier and descendant of a long line of men who made their money through trade, first in goods and later on the money markets. Rask is fascinated by how the markets work, and has a natural intuition allied to his mathematical brain that enables him to know exactly when to buy or sell. His wealth grows until he is one of the most powerful movers in the economy. He is friendless by choice, anti-social and without hobbies. His work is his life. But in mid-life he begins to consider the matter of an heir to carry on the family line.
She is Helen Brevoort, sole daughter of a couple with an aristocratic heritage but no money. Her father tutors her idiosyncratically – she is brilliant at maths and is introduced to all the faddish philosophies of the day. She too is anti-social, but her mother has made it clear that her duty is to marry money…
Or is that really what the book is about?
This is a hard one to review because of the need not to reveal too much, so I shall keep it vague and short! The book is written in four sections, the first telling the story of Benjamin and Helen as a kind of joint biography, and that section stands on its own as a short novel in the vein of books by Edith Wharton or Henry James, examining the social structure and wealth aristocracy of early 20th century America. The other sections re-examine the same story from three different perspectives, each adding to and altering the reader’s understanding, so that in the end we are clearer about the ‘true’ lives of this couple, but also about the writing of the biography. It reminded me not a little of Citizen Kane – the same larger-than-life characters, the same sense of growing isolation as wealth and power become ends rather than means, the same arrogance and hubris.
It’s brilliantly done. In each section, Diaz creates a different narrative voice and style, and each is as believable as the others. Changes in perception are done subtly, so that for the most part ‘facts’ remain the same – it is the interpretation that alters. The examination extends beyond the lives of the Rasks, to look at the motivations and influences of the various narrators, so that there are stories within stories, gradually widening out to take us into different layers of society and see the tensions caused by the huge disparity between rich and poor. There is politics here, but not polemics – Diaz examines capitalism critically rather than with outright condemnation, and at the other end of the scale he looks at how communism and anarchism grew as a response to extreme inequality, without overtly suggesting that these philosophies are more likely to produce a better society.

But strip the politics out, and also the history of the market gamblers who caused the Crash, and what is left is an intensely human story about character. Who are Helen and Benjamin really? What factors made them into the people they became? How can we ever be sure we know the truth about anyone, even when their fame means that every detail of their lives seems to be played out on the front pages of the newspapers? And in here too is a look at the status of women and how they are perceived, with competing pictures of Helen very much dependant on the stance of the people telling her story.
I found it fascinating and absorbing, well worthy of its longlisting for the Booker nomination, and I’m disappointed that it hasn’t been shortlisted. I hope I’ve said enough to whet your appetite, without spoiling the experience of reading it for yourself. Highly recommended!
NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, Picador via NetGalley.
You certainly have me interested in this one; the same story from changed perspective in particular intrigues me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked the changing perspectives and thought he handled it really well. It could have felt repetitive, but he managed to avoid that by having each one of them have a story of their own too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you you enjoyed this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha, me too – I’ve been having a run of grumpy reviews recently! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so glad you enjoyed this one. I started it thinking it might fall flat on its face but finished it with admiration and lots to think about. Clever, but not flash.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I thought it might end up being repetitive but I thought he handled the different perspectives really well. And I did find it thought-provoking – it didn’t end at all in the way I was expecting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Added this to the list 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, good – I hope you enjoy it! Helen is an interesting character… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, you have definitely intrigued me! The setting and basic plot sound like my kind of thing – and for it to be done so well is impressive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I was worried the four perspectives might make it feel a bit repetitive but I thought he handled it really well, with each narrator having their own story to add to the mix.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This does sound absolutely fascinating, FictionFan. It’s a very clever way to explore the markets and the people who caused them to crash. At the same time, it sounds as though it also depicts the people who lived at the time and the forces that moved them. It sounds like an interesting look at the culture of the times, too. And I do like a book with multiple perspectives on the same story. I’m not surprised you were drawn in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Serendipity meant that I was reading it just as our crazed brief PM/Chancellor duo were in the midst of crashing the markets and plunging us into a financial crisis, so that was an added element of… fun! 😉 He handled the market side well – enough info to inform but not befuddle. A really interesting one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds great, definitely on my list thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, good – I hope you enjoy it! Helen is an interesting character… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
So glad you liked this FF – I loved it and thought is was beautifully structured.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you enjoyed it too! Yes, I thought he handled the different perspectives really well, managing to avoid being too repetitive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, this book sounds so intriguing. Bravo for a well-written book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always love a book that tells something about society but also has a great human story at its heart!
LikeLike
It’s not one I probably would have considered otherwise, but you’ve made it sound quite appealing. Good review and I’m glad you enjoyed it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! I always love a story that has a political edge but isn’t banging a drum, and has a great human story at its heart!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your review is making me wonder if I should add it to my TBR. I’ve heard lots of good things and yet I haven’t felt drawn to it. Hmmm…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wasn’t sure about it either, but it turned out much better than I thought it might. I thought he handled the four perspectives really well, without letting it become repetitive. If you do decide to go for it, I hope you enjoy it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I probably wouldn’t have considered this one … except for your glowing review! I’m intrigued to read the differences between sections and how the author handled such a plotline.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought the four perspectives might make it feel a bit repetitive, but I thought he handled them really well, with each narrator having something to add to the overall story, and having a story of their own too. Always enjoy a story with a political edge so long as the author isn’t banging a drum, and so long as it’s all about the characters in the end!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This sounds excellent, and I’ve read glowing reviews from other bloggers too. It certainly seems ambitious, and great that the author pulls it off!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m surprised it didn’t make the Booker shortlist. It’s both interesting and well done. I thought the four perspectives might make it feel a bit repetitive, but he handled them really well so that each bit added to the story. A winner in my book!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Certainly interested me in this and I am about to add it to the list. Thanks for the review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, good – I hope you enjoy it! I’m sorry it didn’t make the Booker shortlist – it would have if I’d been one of the judges! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m very fond of multiple voices (done well, that is) stories, there’s a depth and fullness to them that maybe isn’t possible otherwise. So glad you really enjoyed this one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
When it’s done well it can be really effective. Sometimes it risks coming over as a bit repetitive, but I felt he avoided that by having each narrator have something extra to add to the overall story. Good stuff!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alrighty, you’ve got me hook, line, and sinker on this one. Ready to order right now. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, hurrah! Haha, after my last comment about trying to add to your list, I’m now feeling quite smug! 😉 Hope you enjoy it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
An incredible review – the sort that makes me feel inadequate when it comes to blogging! I snapped this up on a 99p Kindle Daily Deal, as I’d read so much about it and the concept was fascinating. The talent required to make each part of the book work is huge. I’m definitely going to make a start on this soon – you’ve absolutely got my appetite whetted! Again, kudos to you for this review. 👏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aw, thank you! But your reviews are great! I hope you enjoy this one – I loved the way each section made you reassess the central characters while learning more about the narrators too.
LikeLike
I really like the sound of this one! These larger than life characters sound fascinating, And I haven’t watched Citizen Kane – is the movie based on a book?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, I think it was an original screenplay, co-written by Orson Welles and… erm… some other guy. 😉 But it’s based on the true-life character of William Randolph Hearst, I believe – a newspaper mogul in early 20th century America. I don’t love the movie, but it’s interesting…
LikeLiked by 1 person