There’s only one word for it…
🙂 🙂 😐
When Jim Henderson receives an invitation to spend the weekend at Thrackley, the country house of a man called Edwin Carson, he’s puzzled. Although the older man claims to have been a friend of Jim’s long dead father, Jim doesn’t remember ever meeting him or even hearing his name. However, Jim’s found it difficult to get employment since he came back from the war, so the idea of some free food and free accommodation are very welcome, especially when he discovers his old school friend Freddie Usher has also been invited. Carson is a collector of jewels, and it’s not long before the reader discovers his methods of collection aren’t always honest. Over the course of the weekend, Jim will find himself surrounded by thefts, missing persons, murder and attractive women.
When I say that I preferred this to the only other book of Melville’s that I’ve read, Quick Curtain, I have to qualify that by pointing out that I thought Quick Curtain was pretty awful. This one isn’t awful, but it’s not good either. The plot is a mess, full of inconsistencies, holes, continuity errors and coincidences. There’s no mystery aspect since we know early on that Carson is a villain, so it all comes down to whether he’ll escape or be caught. It’s redeemed somewhat by the enjoyable banter between Jim and his old school friend, and by the light-hearted romance that Jim has with Carson’s daughter, Mary. This keeps it readable, so that despite my harrumphing every time the plot took another leap away from credibility, I managed to stick with it quite easily to the end.
And what an end! Sometimes the word silly doesn’t cut it, while farcical implies a level of skill that is distinctly missing here. Throw in a lot of big reveals, have some terrible things happen and no one seeming to much care, have the police totally laid back about the various criminal acts that have been carried out by the guests, and really, what is the right word to describe this shambles? The one that seems best to fit is preposterous. And what’s even more preposterous is that it seems to have been quite a hit when it came out, even being made into a movie. (Note to self: don’t watch it…)
So not awful, but close…
NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, the British Library.
Three constipated smileys seems rather generous based on your review. Unless the light-hearted romance really won you over that much. I may start to worry if that’s the case though.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haha, well, I had generously given his other book two stars for some odd reason, so this one had to get an extra half! But I agree it’s too much. I shall make sure to deduct a star or two from some other book to even things up…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, I read this early in lockdown and was up for some silliness, so didn’t mind the plot holes too much. Yes, it is preposterous, but I interpreted it as a bit of a commentary on the upper and moneyed classes (not always the same thing). Which is probably not what the writer intended, but good fun.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was enjoying it just about till the end, but really, it didn’t just cross the credibility line, it jumped over it and fell down a cliff! I just don’t think his style of humour works for me… oh, well!
LikeLike
Well done for making it to the bitter end. Judging by your review I think it would have been DNF for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I’d known how bad the ending was going to be I’d have DNF’d it for sure. But he sneakily kept the worst for last… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, that was sneaky 🤨
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think we can safely say this writer is not for you. The premis of this one doesn’t actually sound too bad, shame it didn’t work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, yes, I think I should probably give up on him now. I think his humour just doesn’t really work for me, so I’m less willing than other readers to overlook the dreadful plotting.
LikeLike
Oh, dear! I hope it was short.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, yes, that was the one really good thing about it! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
*Thinking* Nope, not my sort of read, FictionFan. I don’t care much for plot holes, unless the rest of the story is truly excellent. And although I like banter as much as the next reader, it’s not enough to salvage a story for me, if that makes sense. I get your point about ‘not awful, but close,’ to be honest. Well, at least my TBR is safe for the moment… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
If I’d enjoyed the humour more, I might have been more forgiving about the plot issues, but his humour just doesn’t seem to work for me. And really, the ending is so ridiculous that I felt as if I’d been cheated! I don’t think this one is likely to make my Book of the Year lists… 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can understand feeling disappointed by this one – I think your review is fair. The British Library CC Melville you haven’t reviewed (Death of Anton) is a much better read but given your disappointment in both these titles I can imagine not being excited to seek it out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a pity I didn’t read Death of Anton first, because I’ve seen a few people say they enjoyed it. But no, I think my experiences with Melville have put me off trying any more. Sometimes an author and reader are just not meant to be together! 😉
LikeLike
Completely understand that feeling!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ugh. Sounds like a stint in purgatory. You must have enjoyed it a little for the three stars though — personally, I haven’t waded through this one and have no plans to. Lockdown or no!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It started off OK and would have been enjoyable enough if it had been for the terrible ending, But I’m afraid his humour didn’t work well enough for me to be able to overlook all the other problems!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like this author is not for you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, yes, I’m rapidly coming to that conclusion!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sticking with it quite easily to the end is some recommendation!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was reasonably enjoyable till it got to that awful ending – not brilliant, but OK. But I’m afraid he sneakily kept the worst for last… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, I love the word ‘preposterous’. I will perhaps not make this or the other Melville novel my first from the British Library Crime Classics collection. 😅
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, it was the word that seemed best to fit! No! Don’t start with him! There are loads of good ones to choose from… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are definitely books in this series that I wonder why they ever decided to reprint them. They’re very hit and miss for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found the earlier ones particularly variable, but I feel as if they’ve got into their stride now and I find I like most of the new ones. They do seem to take account of reception, because I see they’re publishing more and more of the authors readers have praised.
LikeLike
Well then, guess I’ll just move along. Relieved since you’ve been tempting me with others….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha, yes, I won’t be doing any arm-twisting to get people to read this one… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whew! My TBR is safe from getting another addition! At least the cover looks good….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha, sad to say, in this case the cover is the best bit of the book… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought this one was pretty over the top.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, especially the ending. I guess it depends on how well his humour works for you – unfortunately, I didn’t find it was enough to make up for the plotting problems.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It had that over-complicated plot that is common among so many mystery novels of that period.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it’s as if they think that if they just throw in loads of stuff at the end we won’t notice all the plot holes…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s such a wonderful trade-off reading a review from you that makes me smile 😀 instead of reading a book which won’t 😕 Thank you! 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha, glad you get pleasure from my pain – that makes it all worthwhile! 😉 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
“So not awful, but close” might just be my favourite description yet!
At least the cover is good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha, and that was me being nice about it, too! 😉 Yes, sad to say, the cover is the best bit of the book on this occasion…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know, it might be fun to check out the movie and make fun of it. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha, so wicked! But it is tempting… 😉
LikeLike
Ha! Your review made me laugh, especially because i know the exact kind of Harumping you’re doing, I do it myself when unbelievable things happen in books. I tried googling the movie trailer because I love seeing what you’re talking about in the trailer format, alas, I could not find it, so perhaps that’s for the best? LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think the movie had a different title, but I can’t remember what it was! I can only hope it also had a different ending… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person