Space Odyssey: The Making of a Masterpiece by Michael Benson

Caution: Geniuses at Work

😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the release of 2001: A Space Odyssey, the masterpiece science fiction film that grew out of a collaboration between two creative geniuses, Arthur C Clarke and Stanley Kubrick. In this book, Michael Benson tells the story of that collaboration, and of the making of the film, its release and its impact at the time and since.

A couple of years ago, I had the amazing experience of reading Clarke’s book and then immediately watching Kubrick’s film, and discovering how wonderfully they enhance each other. Until then, I hadn’t realised they arose out of a joint venture – I had assumed Clarke had written the book first and then Kubrick had decided to turn it into a film. Benson starts by telling the story of how Kubrick wanted to make the first “really good” science fiction movie and, as research, immersed himself in the SF literature of the day, including reading Clarke’s Childhood’s End. This led him to approach Clarke with a view to them working together. At that stage, the plan was to make a kind of future history of man’s experiences in space. Throughout his book, Benson shows how this initial plan grew and altered stage by stage until it became the book and film that were ultimately released, and gives a fascinating picture of two creative giants working together, mostly in harmony, each inspiring the other so that the end results were greater than either could have achieved alone.

Kubrick and Clarke on set

Benson is clearly a huge admirer of the film and of both men, but he’s not so starry-eyed as to be uncritical when it’s deserved. Clarke was struggling financially as the project began, while Kubrick was riding high on the back of the success of his previous film, Dr Strangelove. This meant Kubrick had disproportionate power in the making of the deal between them, and he wasn’t hesitant in making sure the lion’s share of all profits and credit would come his way. He also retained control over every aspect, including when Clarke would be allowed to release the book. Since the making of the film fell years behind schedule, this caused Clarke considerable financial woe. But Benson also shows that the two men managed to survive this kind of friction without it dimming their appreciation of each other’s genius. Benson’s book is a warm-hearted portrayal of both men and it seems to me he tries hard, and succeeds, in giving due credit to both.

The book is an excellently balanced mix of the technical geekery of film-making with the human creativity behind it. Not just Clarke and Kubrick, but all of the major members of the crew come to life, as Benson illustrates their personalities with well-timed and well-told anecdotes about life on the set. The quality of Benson’s writing is first-rate, and I loved that he would break up the more technical side of the story by introducing “voices” for some of the people to whom he introduces us. For example, when a young lad looking for his first break in movie-making goes off to meet Kubrick, Benson tells the story in a kind of Holden Caulfield voice, while the filming of the scene of Kubrick’s little daughter talking to her on-screen daddy is told charmingly, as if from her six-year-old perspective.

Kubrick and his daughter Vivian

Clarke fades a little from the story once his book is more or less written, although the two men continued to consult and communicate throughout the project. But once the filming gets underway, Benson concentrates more on Kubrick and his crew. He shows the innovative techniques they developed as they went along to create not only the special effects but an entire overarching style. Kubrick is shown as demanding, a perfectionist, always pushing a little further than his crew believed they could go until they discovered that they could go further after all. Although he had his faults – a willingness to risk his actors’ and crew’s safety in pursuit of his art, for example – the impression comes through strongly that the people around him admired, respected and even loved him. Benson gives generous praise to each of the other creatives who contributed to the movie, detailing each innovative technique and who was involved in achieving it. As he describes it, it felt to me like an orchestra full of individually brilliant musicians, with Kubrick as the genius conductor melding their talents into a wonderfully harmonious whole.

Kubrick setting up a shot

In the final section, Benson describes the release of the movie, initially panned by all the middle-aged men (and occasionally women) in suits in movie world, from studio chiefs to movie critics. He explains how Kubrick watched audience reaction minute by minute to see what worked and what didn’t, eventually cutting nineteen minutes from the original running time. But he and others also noticed that young people in the audience seemed to “get” it in a way that the movie professionals didn’t at first. Despite the critics, audience figures gave an indication that word of mouth was making the movie a success. Gradually, even the original critics mostly came round, and admitted that on second and third viewing they “got” it too. The film’s success was crowned with a raft of Oscar nominations, though in an extremely competitive year that included Oliver! and The Lion in Winter amongst others, eventually it took only one, rather fittingly for Best Special Visual Effects.

I haven’t even touched on a lot of what is included in this comprehensive book, such as how Kubrick decided on the music for the film, or how the man-apes were conceived and created. The quality of the writing and research together with Benson’s great storytelling ability make this not only informative but a real pleasure to read – as much a masterpiece of its kind as the original film and book are of theirs. Highly recommended.

NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, Simon & Schuster.

Amazon UK Link
Amazon US Link

35 thoughts on “Space Odyssey: The Making of a Masterpiece by Michael Benson

  1. Oh, this sounds absolutely fascinating, FictionFan! I had no idea that Clarke and Kubrick had worked together on film and book. It makes a lot of sense, though, as I can see how they book and film work together. And it sounds as though this is a well-told story in itself, which makes it all even better. What a great ‘behind the scenes’ sort of a book!


    • Yes, it seems to have been a fascinating collaboration with both of them putting as much into the story as each other. Given its success, it surprises me more writers and directors haven’t tried to do something similar. And this book really did them both justice – so well researched and written!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. The thing that always blew me away about 2001 was that fact that Leonard Rossiter’s in it. Somehow I never quite connected Rigsby from Rising Damp with cutting edge science fiction!


    • Hahaha – it’s good to think there will be room for Rigsbys in the far distant future! Er… past! I hope he didn’t spill Campari on Joan Collins on their way to the moon…


  3. Great review! I’d like to read this book, though I fear I’ll wind up disgusted with Kubrick because of that film deal and his micromanaging. But how cool that the film was a harmonious collaboration.


    • I thought I might end up hating Kubrick too, but actually I came to the conclusion that, though he was a bit mean to Clarke, in fact he contributed far more to the collaboration, so in a sense it was fair that he had control of it. And Clarke did benefit from the success of the movie eventually. It was also intriguing to see that although Kubrick was incredibly demanding of his cast and crew, they seemed to like him as well as simply respecting him. And he gave lots of youngsters their first chance in movie-making. All round, I liked him a lot more than I expected to…


      • I’m glad you ended up liking Kubrick. I always think of how he pushed Shelley Duvall to hysterics in that scene in The Shining when she’s swinging the baseball bat at her husband. I’m also reminded of what a tyrant James Cameron could be to poor Linda Hamilton in the Terminator film. I’d find a pattern if I kept my brain wandering.


    • Thanks! 😀 What I liked about this one is that there was loads more about the human side of it than the geekery, though there was enough of that to let me understand how innovative a lot of the techniques were. A great read!


  4. Coming back to this when not working! This is one of my favorite films. I am constantly in awe of how impressive it remains and can only imagine the effect that must have had on initial audiences. I went through heck and back to get my current BluRay edition 😂


    • I definitely think you’d have had to have seen the movie and probably loved it to really enjoy this book. So that’s your plan for next weekend… read Arthur Clarke’s book, watch the movie, then read this book… enjoy! 😜

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Ok, so this one is going on my son and husband’s Christmas list. They’ll have to share. We have Alexa in our home, thanks to them. And if you tell her “Alexa, Close the pod bay doors.” She responds with I’m sorry, Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that. They’re already closed.” Sci-fi is real.


Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.