The Gowk Storm by Nancy Brysson Morrison

A Scottish classic…

😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

This is the tale of three sisters, daughters of the minister in a parish in the Highlands of Scotland. Our narrator is the youngest of the three, Lisbet, who over the course of the couple of years of the book’s story grows from a girl only half comprehending her elder sisters’ early forays into the world of romantic love, into a young woman on whom the two older girls come to depend for support. The date is unspecified, I believe, but the book was published in 1933 and it reads as if the story is set somewhere in the decade or two before that, at a time when young girls had more freedom than Austen’s heroines, for example, but were still confined by lack of opportunity and girded round by social restrictions, breaches of which would inevitably lead to scandal and ruin.

I mention Austen in my little introduction because the comparison was running in my head throughout most of my reading of the book. Like Austen, this is fundamentally a book about young women seeking the men they will eventually marry but, also like her, it’s much more than that. It portrays the society of a particular place at a moment in time and does so brilliantly, showing the subtle social stratifications that limit the lives and suitable marriage prospects of these moderately privileged girls still further. Since this is Scotland, the book also shows the stranglehold of Protestant intolerance that has blighted the country since Knox, and the anti-Catholic discrimination that goes hand-in-hand with that.

The dominie could read from a snail on a blade of grass or the flight of a bird every whim of the weather. He would tell us it was not going to thunder because he had noticed a trout jumping in the loch or that we must expect rain for he had seen a craikie heron ‘take to the hill’. There were other things he told us of as he helped us over dykes or went in front to guide us through boggy places: how death and the eddying fairies came from the pale west, and the white chancy south brought summer and long life, giants and ill-luck strode from the black north, and only good could come out of the sacred east.

The writing is superb and, to continue the Austen comparison a little further, the characterisation of these young girls is beautifully done. None of them is perfect – each has her flaws and idiosyncrasies. The two eldest, Julia and Emmy, are a little like Elinor and Marianne from Sense and Sensibility – Julia’s strong feelings masked by her outward calm, and with the intellect and strength of character to overcome the slings and arrows of her fortune; Emmy driven by emotion, unwilling, perhaps unable, to accept society’s restrictions. Lisbet is clear-sighted about her sisters, and about herself. Although she is young during the events of the book, it is written as if by her older self looking back, giving her narration a feeling of more maturity and insight than her younger self may have had at the time. Lisbet is also profoundly affected by her physical surroundings, describing the landscape and weather in lush passages of great beauty, full of colour and a sense almost of mysticism.

A pale green light poured down from the wintry sky, as though this earth were lit by chance rays from some other world. Grey sheep silently ate split turnips in the brown fields. The snow had melted in the low lands, leaving everything sad dun shades, and only streaked the mountains, where it lay like the skeletons of huge, prehistoric animals. The shouldering outline of the mountains cut against the horizon, their detail of burn, crag and ravine lost in the immensity of their shadowed bulk. It was as though, in those transient windless seconds between dawn and daylight, the world had resolved itself again into the contours and substances that composed it before man trod on its earth and drank in its air.

But despite all my comparisons, there are elements that make the book very different in tone from Austen. Although there are plenty of moments where we see the touching love and loyalty among the sisters, there is little of the wit and humour displayed in most of Austen’s works. This book is darker, with a tone of pathos and impending tragedy created by the subtlest hints of foreshadowing. I don’t want to tell any of the story because its gradual unfolding is one of the book’s great strengths. But there isn’t that feeling of certainty that all misunderstandings and obstacles will be cleared away in time for a happy ending for all of these girls. And, dare I say, the eventual outcomes have something more of the ring of truth about them as a result.

‘There’s plenty of time for my breakfast and your wedding,’ he informed her, ‘as I’m sure Drake would tell you. You know, our whole lives consist of this kind of thing – seeing things out of proportion. Think of the furore and fever we worked ourselves into last year over something that now leaves us quite cold.’

‘I hope it will take more than a year for my marriage to leave me cold,’ Julia rejoined.

‘You never know,’ he replied lugubriously, ‘for after all love is merely seeing the loved one hopelessly out of proportion. Then, you’ll find, you’ll both waken up one day to the fact that the other is quite ordinary and is peopling the world in hundreds. That’s why I never married,’ he added complacently, ‘ I always knew I would be the first to waken up.’

The vast majority of the book is written in standard English, with just some Scottish dialect in the dialogue of one or two characters. However there is a sprinkling of Scottish words throughout, some of which have faded into complete obscurity now, but many of which are still used by older Scots. The meanings of most of them are clear by their context, but I was a little disappointed that my Canongate Classics edition has neither a glossary nor footnotes – not that they are essential, but to add to the interest for non-Scots and younger Scots alike. I would also warn forcibly not to read the introduction by Edwin Morgan before reading the book – he gives away the entire plot (and frankly adds little depth to the understanding of the book).

I was not, however, disappointed in any way by the book itself. In my opinion, it’s easily of the quality of Lewis Grassic Gibbon’s much better known Sunset Song and, in fact, I think I enjoyed it even more. I am sorry it seems to have sunk into relative obscurity. The quality of the writing and characterisation; the beautiful descriptions of the wild landscape and weather of the Highlands; the delicately nuanced portrayal of the position of women within this small, rather isolated society; the story that manages tragedy without melodrama and hope without implausibility – all of these mean it richly merits its status as a Scottish classic, and deserves a much wider readership than it has.

The carriage moved forward. We turned the bend in the road where we used to stand to see if any one were coming. I heard the immeasurable murmur of the loch, like a far-away wave that never breaks upon the shore, and the cry of a curlew. All the world’s sorrow, all the world’s pain, and none of its regret, lay throbbing in that cry.

Amazon UK Link
Amazon US Link

Book 11 of 90

60 thoughts on “The Gowk Storm by Nancy Brysson Morrison

  1. I get so annoyed when introductions and forewards give away plots, FictionFan. I really wish they wouldn’t do that. That rant over, the book does sounds like a really thoughtful portrait of these sisters’ lives. And the setting and context appeal to me, too. I was intrigued by your comment about the Scottish words and phrases that aren’t really used any more. Just shows you how language changes over time. Hmm….a somewhat darker, more recent cousin to Jane Austen’s characters….that does sound interesting!

    • So do I! I can’t see why they don’t shove them at the back as afterwords. Actually I rarely want to read about a book just before I read the book anyway – I’d rather form my own opinions and then see if the introduction has anything to add to my understanding. But this is a lovely book – it’s a pity the cultural dominance of England within the UK means that so few books from Scotland and Wales get read by new generations. And of course that’s why so much of our language continues to disappear too. I’m hoping schools maybe do a better job at promoting Scottish classics nowadays than they did in my time. And despite my disappointment with Canongate, at least they’re making a big effort to get some of these forgotten books back in print…

  2. I have never heard of this – clearly my knowledge of Scottish classics stops at Sir Walter Scott or Robert Burns. Am making a note of it… let’s hope my local library has it.

    • Me too, sadly, and with much less of an excuse! I had to consult lists to come up with some Scottish classics for my classics club list, and truthfully I haven’t ever heard of several of them. Despite my criticism of this Canongate edition, at least they’re doing a lot to bring some of these forgotten books back into print. What a pity your library doesn’t have it – maybe they could order it? I believe her biographies are well regarded – that seems to be what she’s best remembered for now.

  3. What is it with people writing ‘introductions’ that are really just a long synopsis that adds nothing in the way of insight?! It really aggravates me. I recently read ‘Northanger Abbey’ for the first time, and my edition had an introduction by P.D. James and I thought to myself, ‘Well, this should be interesting; I’m sure she’ll have some insight into the circumstances surrounding the publishing and writing of this book’ – and she did, for about two paragraphs. And then the entire rest of the so-called introduction was just a summary of the entire story! Why even bother!? I think it’s just so they can put a popular modern author’s name on the book to lure people in, as though the strength of the story isn’t enough on its own.

    • I know – it drives me mad! I love a good introduction if it tells you about the historical context or explains themes that might not be obvious to modern audiences or whatever, but even then I think they should be afterwords rather than introductions. But ones that just summarise the plot? Gah! Who on earth would want to read that, especially just before they read the book!

    • I’ve found that these people who write introductions often point out their favorite–that is, best–parts in the book while they give their summer, so in total the reader gets a summary, the best parts spoiled, and someone they don’t know gushing about a book. I mean, that’s what blog friends and book clubs are for. I don’t need the author’s favorite writer friend or former professor doing that. It reads as rather “circle jerking,” as my husband likes to say. I read one book this year in which the introduction quoted literally ALL the best parts in the books, so when I got there, it was old hat.

      • I know – it drives me crazy. I’m well-trained now, so I never read them till afterwards but even then as often as not I don’t see the point. But on the rare occasion that you get a really good informative foreword it can make a big difference. Martin Edwards does the forewords for all these British Library Crime Classics books I’ve been reading, and he tells just enough to give some background, but never gives any spoilers, so I’ve learned to trust him and now happily read his intros first…

  4. This sounds wonderful! It seems it has everything – and from what I’ve read here, the descriptions of the Scottish landscape sounds fabulous. I’m afraid it will have to go on the list… along with the other one… my list is getting rather long!

  5. The last quote is a piece of lovely writing. I haven’t read this one, but I can see how you’d find it interesting. Why do publishers feel compelled to include intros that spoil a story for readers? ‘Tis bad enough when they put such stuff at the end of a book, but to place it at the beginning is uncalled-for! It does a real disservice to both writer and reader.

    • Isn’t it? And it rather sums up the tone of the book perfectly, I thought – sorrow, but without despair. These intros drive me crazy – why would anyone want to read a plot summary just before they read the book?? Stick it in as an afterword by all means, but honestly in some cases they really add so little that you have to wonder why they bother at all.

  6. I’m so glad you enjoyed this, it’s been a favourite of mine since I read it at Uni. Her other books are well worth reading, but I think The Gowk Storm was her best. If Scotland had had an educational system that valued Scottish literature, these and other modern classics would not come as such a surprise (gets off soapbox, fans herself, takes a deep breath – and relax!).

    • I wasn’t sure how I’d get on with it – the fact that it’s so forgotten didn’t bode well. But I think it’s right up there with any of the great classics, Scottish or otherwise, and certainly isn’t so Scottish that it would be difficult for anyone else to read. Yep, our educators have a lot to answer for – I keep hoping it might be better now, but the fact that so many Scottish classics are still out of print suggests things haven’t improved as much as I’d have hoped. So despite my criticisms of Canongate, at least they’re making the effort to get some of these books back out there…

  7. Your great review and comparison to Austen has me intrigued. I looked on Amazon and saw that there’s a copy used shipping from Florida – most of the others are shipping from the UK. I’ll try to get a copy!

    • Oh, if you manage to get one, I do hope you’ll enjoy it! I knew nothing about it – so many Scottish classics have been allowed to sink into obscurity – so I was delighted to love it so much. I feel it deserves the title of ‘classic’, plus it’s just a lovely book to read. You may need extra tissues and chocolate though… 😉

  8. Your excerpts show the author was a wonderful writer, and I certainly feel tempted. I do love proper evocation of the natural world. When the writer does this well, as here, pictures form in my mind.

    As for those pesky introductions, they really should be Afterwords. The revelations of a journey which should be up to the reader to make in innocence, as the writer intends, always make me think the foreword writer is lost in an A level Eng Lit paper mindset, and feeling they must tell the story so the teacher knows they have read this. Okay, perhaps a little cruel. First year undergrad, lecturer.

    • Well, I hate to say it, but I do feel this is a Lady Fancifullish book. The writing is wonderful, and the characterisation is just as good. And it sets it within society with a bit of anger about the place of women, without getting either political or polemical about it.

      Gah! These intros drive me mad – who would ever want to read a plot summary just before reading the book?? When I saw it was Edwin Morgan I thought it might be really insightful, but truthfully he didn’t state anything except the obvious, so even as an afterword it would have been disappointing. But despite my criticisms, I’m still glad Canongate are making the effort to bring some of these forgotten Scottish classics back into print, so kudos to them for that…

  9. I’ve been curious about this book since you mentioned it a while ago, so I’m pleased to see such a positive review from you. What a shame it isn’t better known. It definitely sounds like something I should think about reading. Thanks for the warning about the introduction – although I have learned from experience never to read them until I’ve finished the book!

    • So many Scottish classics are not well known because our education system means we’re all brought up reading the English classics instead of our own. So I was delighted that I liked this one so much and might be able to introduce at least a few more readers to it! Yes, I’m the same – I flick quickly past the intro, and then go back to it after I’ve finished. So many of them are full of spoilers – grrr!!

  10. As always a superb review of a book that I’ve never heard of and yet suspect I would thoroughly enjoy. I’m glad you gave the warning about the introduction – I no longer read them until the end of the book having been caught out before – if it gives the plot away and adds nothing it sounds like the publishers efforts would have been better spent on the glossary.

    • Thank you! 😀 Yes, I think you might indeed like this one, if you ever get a chance. These intros drive me crazy – why do they do it?? I never read them till afterwards now, but it’s still tempting and they so often spoil the whole story. I wish Canongate had included a glossary, but I still give them credit for at least trying to bring some of these forgotten Scottish classics back to life… 😀

  11. This book sounds great! Thank you for your excellent review.

    I hate when introductions tell the whole story. Obvious that writer was a little unclear on the meaning of introduction.

    • Thanks, L. Marie – and it is great! One that definitely deserves to be better known.

      These intros drive me nuts – why would anyone think a reader wants to be told the whole story just before they read the book?? Grrrr!!

  12. I wonder why some classics continue to thrive and some don’t, when there appears to be no clear reason for it? Well, I’m glad to hear you liked this so much – now I have a good Scottish classic to add to my list (something I was lacking).

    When I first saw the cover I thought you were reviewing “Tess of the D’Urbervilles” – my copy has the same girl on the cover. Maybe Tess had a twin living in Scotland? 😉

    • I know – lots of great books get forgotten while with some of the ones that are still considered classics, it’s hard to understand why. With Scottish classics, though, a lot of it is to do with our education system which has enforced the reading of English literature rather than Scottish literature for most of the last century. So most Scots know embarrassingly little about our own literary tradition. If you do get to read this one sometime, I hope you enjoy it!

      Ha! Yes, it is indeed the same girl! Another blogger did a post last week on books that used the same or similar pictures as covers, and she found one picture of an old dilapidated hut that had been used as the cover on no less than five different books, several of them well known! So much for creativity… 😉

  13. I did enjoy the Sunset Song Trilogy and I’ve downloaded The Gowk Storm now after reading your review. Looking forward to a good story and connecting with my Scottish heritage 🙂

    • Oh, I hope you enjoy it! One great thing about Kindle (or e-books in general) is that they make so many more books available than any bookshop could reasonably stock. I’d love to hear what you think of it. 🙂

  14. I find that quote in which the man says he never got married because he knows he would be the one to “wake up” first quite chilling…I feel like he’s right but also way off but also honest. It’s a lot of emotions that hit me at once, thus the chill.

    • It’s excellent writing, isn’t it? And in the context of the situation (without giving spoilers) it’s actually got an added level of poignancy that doesn’t come over when it’s given out of context like this. Her writing is really quite stunning…

  15. I FINALLY read this book! Your review is spot on. Love this book, but it was extraordinarily painful to read, given the current issues we’re having with the patriarchy. But her writing is wonderful. Thank you for cluing me into this one!

    • Oh, hurrah! I’m so glad you enjoyed it! Yes, it’s odd – and I don’t mean this to be as smug as it sounds – but from being so far behind in patriarchal and repressive attitudes, Scotland seems to have come much further forward than America now. I’m not saying we don’t still have sexism and misogyny, especially in the workplace, but I don’t feel it’s a major issue for most people now. We have a female First Minister and nobody ever speaks as if that’s odd – and the leader of the opposition is also female, gay, and expecting a baby with her partner – and she’s highly popular! I think maybe the repression was so bad that when we finally rejected it, we jumped over a few stages… maybe!

          • Dan Rather, one of our more respected news journalists, had this to say on Facebook: Over the course of the last few years, as our ship of state shudders on dangerous and uncharted shoals, I can feel the waves of despair shake the confidence of so many fair and decent Americans. How can this be our country? Where is all that I knew, and trusted, and cherished?

            Today, in the wake of yesterday’s events on Capitol Hill, I hear these fears pour forth once more. It is understandable and even appropriate. But as someone who has the perspective of a long life and whatever approximation of wisdom that comes with it, I remain unbowed and even optimistic in what I saw.

            Yesterday a courageous fellow citizen stood up and told her story. Unlike with Anita Hill, at least half of the senators on the panel treated her with respect. That is progress. Unlike in the past, many of those senators were accomplished women who you could imagine someday being president. That is progress. A culture that in the not-so-distant past had no notion of “date rape” now does. And that is progress. Millions of men as well as women will not stand for it. And that is progress. Across the country a great spirit of righteous political fury is brewing, and it is propelling more women to positions of leadership. And that is progress.

            Time and time again, in the course of American history, solitary acts of courage have blossomed into movements for social justice. When Rosa Parks refused to move to the back of the bus, any Civil Rights Act seemed a hopeless dream. But she, and the brave men and women who supported and followed her action with actions of their own, knew that the path to justice was not going to be quick or painless but that they were on the right side of history.

            The early protesters of the Vietnam War were written off as communists and un-American. So too was Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and the other early women suffragists who gathered in Seneca Falls. Labor leaders, children’s rights advocates, environmentalists, those who marched at Stonewall and Ferguson, those who have fought for immigrant rights and against religious hatred and now in the #MeToo movement, these are fights for justice that are far from over. But millions of Americans are aware and awake and motivated to action. This can, and should, start at the ballot box.

            And to this pantheon of courageous Americans we can now add the name of Christine Blasey Ford. Whatever the tides of history are in the short term I believe that too many of my fellow Americans understand what is right and what is just to not have her voice echo forth with clarity well into a better future.

            Steady. #WhatUnitesUs

            • Gotta admit, Jilanne, I’m not wholeheartedly in agreement with how the US women’s movement is going. I do not think that all women should automatically be believed any more than I think all men should be. To call Dr Ford a heroine is to assume that she is telling the truth, for which there is no evidence bar her statement. She may be telling the truth – I certainly found her believable – but then I found Kavanaugh’s denial believable too, much though I dislike him. I don’t know the truth, and if everyone would put their partisan tribalism – either over political party or gender aside – I think they would have to agree that they also don’t – can’t – know the truth at this point. I don’t want to live in a society where we replace the presumption of innocence with a presumption of guilt, nor do I want to replace a patriarchy with a matriarchy. I do not believe women are inherently superior to men any more than I believe the reverse.

              My view is that the slogan of feminism should never be “believe all women” but the more nuanced “be open to believing all women”. But a one person allegation – however compellingly delivered – absent any supporting evidence should never be enough to destroy a person’s life. What if I said Obama raped me when he visited Britain. Would you simply believe me? What if in ten years time, I said your son had raped my mythical daughter. Do you still believe me – unquestioningly – if I can point to no corroborating evidence, nor even tell you when and where it happened, and when the people I say were there at the time deny it? Kavanaugh is a father of a daughter and a son of a mother – this damages them all. If he did it, to hell with him. If he didn’t, then this is a travesty and a crime. I’m not willing to condemn him on the basis of what I’ve heard so far (and I listened to every single second of both of their testimony), and I’m not willing to call Dr Ford a heroine until it is proved that she is. Then I will, happily. The only good thing is that finally sense has prevailed and the FBI will look into it. Once we know the truth, if we ever do, that’s when we should laud the accuser, or apologise to the accused. Until then, the presumption of innocence should apply.

              *steps off soapbox* Sorry, but that’s what I meant about evolution, not revolution. When feminists behave like misandrists, they lose the support, not just of men, but of a significant proportion of women, even those of us who have proudly called ourselves feminist in the past. My desire is for equality, not victory.

            • I definitely agree with all related to presumption of innocence. I do, however, think Ford is amazingly courageous, to go through with her testimony, knowing that she approached others first, hoping that things would be dealt with away from the circus spotlight. Courageous to do so in the face of death threats and harm to her family. And courageous to revisit her trauma and do her civic duty instead of allowing things to proceed unquestioned. And it’s important to say, I think, that this isn’t a trial. Kavanaugh is applying for a job. A nonpartisan job, one that he disqualified himself for during his testimony yesterday, by showing just how partisan and vengeful he truly is. Looking at his track record, his denials are extremely disturbing (dating back to his work against Democratic administrations that could, in fact, have involved knowingly received stolen documents), a track record that he has been very evasive or untruthful about. So his credibility has been destroyed in other ways for me. Also, when I see the evidence from his yearbook, his fabrications about what certain terms or comments meant, how other people who knew him during high school and college characterized his drinking and those comments completely differently, cast him in a less-than-truthful light, something I cannot accept in a Supreme Court justice. I do think that the Republicans are trying to ram Kavanaugh’s appointment through without reviewing Ford’s and other women’s charges in a reasonable manner. It is especially upsetting because of the lengths they went through to delay an appointment during the last few months of the Obama administration. And I am old enough to remember what Anita Hill went through. There are so many things going wrong in and outside of our country right now that can be attributed to the tone/precedents set by our questionable leader. OK, I’ll get down off my own soapbox now. I appreciate your candor and willingness to discuss these things in a reasonable fashion. Very refreshing.

  16. I think she’s courageous if she’s telling the truth. I think she’s vile if she’s lying. I think she’s to be pitied if her mental condition has caused her to believe something that isn’t the truth. Until I know which of those applies, I won’t call her brave or vile or pitiable. I get what you’re saying about Kavanaugh, but that’s all politics and character – it’s not proof of sexual assault and the two things need to stop being conflated.

    If he did it, then fine – he deserves to be punished by the law. But if he didn’t – and this jury member remains undecided – then this has been a rape too… of him and his family. Dr Ford’s story has holes too – not least that the three witnesses she named all deny they were ever at such a gathering, including her then best friend who denies even ever having met Kavanaugh. Surely that troubling fact ought to cast at least some doubt on the accuracy of her memories. Let’s wait till those holes are filled before turning her into Rosa Parks Mark II. And please let’s stop suggesting that because he got drunk to the point of throwing up at school that that makes him a probable rapist, for the sake of all our sons and daughters… and ourselves. If that’s evidence of rape, then I must be a rapist.

    All I’m saying is nothing is proved, so let’s hold off till we know more. Vilify Kavanaugh over his political views and his general character and truthfulness by all means, but this isn’t Trump talking about grabbing pussy and paying off porn stars. This is a man about whom there has been no sniff of sexual scandal in thirty years of public service and six FBI background checks, who’s now being publicly accused of running gang-rape parties and God knows what else. And then people say that because he’s acting defensively that proves he must be guilty! For the sake of society, he deserves the presumption of innocence until he is proved guilty. If we want that for black men, and we do, then we need to not deny it to our political opponents because we can’t beat them democratically…

    And could you please try to get control of the Senate in November? Thanks! 😉

Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.