Scarweather by Anthony Rolls

Digging up the truth…

😀 😀 😀 🙂

The story begins in 1913 when our narrator, John Farringdale, is just twenty-one. He and his cousin Eric are more like brothers, so when Eric meets the famous amateur archaeologist Professor Tolgen Reisby, he’s keen to introduce him to Farringdale too. Eric has a bit of a hero-worship for Professor Reisby, but he’s also well on the way to falling in love with Reisby’s much younger wife, Hilda. Farringdale also has a friend who is considerably older than him – Frederick Ellingham, a man of eclectic tastes and knowledge and a wide acquaintanceship across the classes, from seamen to aristocrats. Ellingham knows something of Reisby and hints that there may be darkness hidden beneath his boisterous extrovert exterior! And so when Eric goes missing in what seems like a sailing accident, Ellingham decides to investigate further…

…which takes him roughly a decade and a half to do. Admittedly they all had to stop and go and fight a war in the middle of it all, but frankly those of us with at least one functioning braincell had the whole thing worked out before the war began, so one certainly can’t accuse Ellingham of rushing things. Fortunately, there’s plenty to enjoy in the book, though, even if the plot is so slight as to be almost non-existent.

As Martin Edwards informs us in his introduction, Rolls was himself an archaeologist and he puts his expert knowledge to good use. He pokes a lot of fun about the world of archaeology – the digging up of a shard of broken pot and extrapolation from that of an entire civilisation, the dismissal of anything that seems a bit peculiar as ‘ritual’, the arguments between experts over time periods, and the jealousies over access to the best sites and acquisition of the choicest finds. He also has his characters comment on the ghoulishness of the archaeologist’s enthusiasm for digging up corpses, with Reisby himself keeping a kind of charnel house of finds in his own study. In fact, even the denouement makes fun of the cavalier fashion in which archaeologists spin theories based on the location of a few bones. (I’m sure it’s all very different and much more professional now, even though it all rather reminded me of Tony Robinson rapturising over half a femur or a mangled old bit of bronze in many an episode of Time Team… 😉 )

On another table were the remains of about a dozen skeletons. One or two of these had a remarkably fresh appearance and were nearly complete; but most of them were in a fragmentary state, and the bones were mottled with a dark stain of manganese – the indication (though by no means invariably present) of considerable antiquity. The skeleton of a young woman, slightly burnt, was particularly attractive.

The set-up is a spin on the Holmes/Watson pairing, but I fear Ellingham and Farringdale don’t match up to their illustrious predecessors in either detection or characterisation. Reisby himself is a fun character – a giant of a man, loud and jolly with an uproarious laugh, but also opinionated and quick to fury when crossed. I would definitely cast Brian Blessed in the role.

Scarweather is a remote place on the coast of Northern England, and Rolls does a good job with the setting, allowing the wildness of the landscape and sea to play their part in the story. The isolation of the setting also allows him to show the kind of unlikely friendships that blossom when people live close to each other but far from the rest of society. Many of these secondary characters add to the humour of the book, slightly caricatured but still believable and, on the whole, likeable despite their idiosyncrasies.

So, overall, while this isn’t the most thrilling or fiendish crime novel in the world, it’s still an enjoyable, well-written entertainment.

NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, Poisoned Pen Press.

Amazon UK Link
Amazon US Link

30 thoughts on “Scarweather by Anthony Rolls

  1. This is book sounds alright, I suppose. Nowhere near as good as your review! I cannot help but agree with chronolibrarian – a TV show with the legendary Tony Robinson and the mighty Brian Blessed would be epic! I met Tony Robinson when I took part in a short-lived Channel Four gameshow called Codex (which I won, incidentally). He is absolutely wonderful, quite cheeky and very chatty. I asked him all sorts of things about Time Team and Blackadder and he didn’t mind at all. On evening of the filming, his goldfish had just died, but he was quite jolly about it.


    • Haha! Thank you! The book was quite fun, but calling it a mystery novel was a bit of a stretch! Hahaha! He seems like the type who would be jolly about the death of a goldfish – I bet he buried it with due ritual in the garden, and will pop back in twenty years time and dig it up again. I must go and youtube Codex now…

      Liked by 1 person

    • Haha! I know – I might be able to understand them searching for old jewellery and stuff, but dead bodies? Always seems weird to me! Yes, definitely a lighter one – sometimes I like a book that doesn’t harrow my soul… 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Oh, this does sound like a decent read, FictionFan. I have to admit to a soft spot, too, for books that give an ‘inside look’ at different professions, and it sounds as though the archaeology bit does that. The pace….well…..but still, it sounds enjoyable.


    • I do, too, especially when it’s someone knowledgeable and enthusiastic. The crime element in this one might have been weak but there was plenty of other stuff in it to keep me happy. I usually find that with these BL books actually – they’re good at picking interesting ones…

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I just had to find in and say that Indiana Jones ruined real archaeology for everyone. “It belongs in a museum!!” he yells, while in another film he steals a tribal artifact while being chased by the natives.


  4. When we excavated Glasgow Cathedral, a friend of mine took a skull home and made an ashtray of it. It was that dig that convinced me I didn’t want to spend my life digging up body parts – this sounds like a fun read though.


  5. Meh, I can’t say I’m particularly tempted by this one. Still, I do realize it’s hard to write secondary characters in such a way as to enhance the book, rather than steal the thunder of the main characters. That alone might be worth my checking into this one — never get too much learning, you know!


    • The characterisation in this one was pretty good, but all of a kind of old-fashioned English type, so I’m not sure how useful it would be as a teaching aid… but he was definitely a better writer than a lot of crime novelists of the time.


  6. I kept thinking of this book as “Scareweather” every time you showed the book cover. 🙂
    Sounds like this book was just okay–not quite how I’d imagined it would be when you first mentioned it. Your review of it was hilarious, BTW. 🙂


    • I reckon that would be a better title for it, all those sailing accidents! Haha! Thank you – yes, it’s kind of a crime novel but without much actual crime. Still quite enjoyable, but not quite what the blurb leads you to expect…


Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.