Past Tense (Joel Williams 3) by Margot Kinberg

The sins of the past…

😀 😀 😀 😀

past tenseWhen the foundations are being dug for a new performing arts building at Tilton Univerity in Pennsylvania, the building crew are shocked when they discover a skeleton buried there. Forensic tests show that it belonged to a young man and dates from around forty years earlier. Back in the early ’70s, Bryan Roades was a student at the University. Inspired by the great Woodward and Bernstein investigation into the Watergate affair, Bryan hoped to emulate them by becoming a campaigning journalist. He was preparing a story on women’s issues for the University newspaper, focusing on the Women’s Lib movement and how some of the debates of the time were impacting on the female students. Some of the people he approached, though, didn’t want to see their stories in print, but Bryan was more interested in the greater good (and his own advancement, perhaps) than in individuals’ rights to privacy. When he disappeared, the police could find no trace and most people thought he’d simply done that fashionable thing for the time – gone off to ‘find himself’…

This is Margot Kinberg’s third Joel Williams book, but the first I’ve read. Regular visitors will be well aware that Margot and I are long-time blog buddies, so you will have to assume that there may be a level of bias in this review, but as always I shall try to be as honest as I can.

Joel Williams is an ex-police detective now working as a Professor in Criminal Justice in the fictional university town of Tilton, PA. He still has lots of contacts with his old colleagues in the police department and can’t resist using his inside knowledge of the University when a corpse turns up on campus. But he’s not one of these mavericks who works it all out on his own – we also see the police procedural side of the case through the two detectives who are investigating it, and Joel promptly hands over to them any information he finds. I like this way of handling the ‘amateur detective’ aspect – too often, the reasons for amateur involvement stretch credibility too far, and many authors fall into the cliché of having to make the police look stupid in order to make the amateur look good. But here Joel’s investigation enhances the police one rather than detracting from it.

As someone who is tired to death of the drunken, dysfunctional, angst-ridden detective of fiction, I also greatly appreciated Joel’s normality and stability. He has a job that he enjoys and is good at, he stays sober throughout and has a happy marriage. But he also has a curious mind, especially when it comes to crime, and an empathetic understanding of the people he comes across in the course of his investigation.

margot-kinberg
Margot Kinberg

The small-town setting and the rather closed society of the University within it gives that feeling of everyone knowing everyone else’s business – a setting where privacy is harder to come by than in the anonymity of a big city, and is more treasured for that very reason. Kinberg uses this well to show how people feel threatened when it looks like things they’d rather stay secret might be about to come into the open. The time period adds to this too, and Kinberg makes excellent use of the changes we’ve seen in society over the intervening period – many of the things people were concerned about being revealed back in the ’70s don’t seem like such big scandals today, but could have destroyed careers and even lives back then. And as we learn more about the people Bryan was proposing to write about in his article, the pool of people who may have been willing to take drastic action to stop him grows…

In style, the book mirrors the Golden Age crime – a limited group of suspects, clues, red herrings, amateur detective, etc. And, of course, the second murder! But it also has strong elements of the police procedural, with the two detectives, Crandall and Zuniga, sharing almost equal billing with Joel. There’s a little too much grit in the story for it to fall into ‘cosy’ territory but, thankfully, it also steers clear of the gratuitously gruesome or graphic. I’m not sure how well it will work for people who enjoy the darker, more brutal side of crime fiction, but an intriguing and interesting story for those who prefer the traditional mystery novel. Just my kind of thing, in fact, and I found it a thoroughly enjoyable read. Recommended – and well done, Margot!

NB I won a signed copy of the book in Margot’s competition. Aren’t I lucky? 😀

Amazon UK Link
Amazon US Link

34 thoughts on “Past Tense (Joel Williams 3) by Margot Kinberg

  1. You’re very right about the refreshing change that Joel is helping the police rather than working against them, as is the wont of far too many amateur detectives. And I think the topic of academic/student relationships is a perennial one – so open to abuse, even when the students think they have it in hand. (And vice versa).

    • Yes, I always prefer it when the police are shown as basically competent – otherwise it feels too contrived. Probably why on the whole police procedurals work better for me, so I liked that this one had quite a big element of the police procedural in it. And I always like university settings – a great way to bring together a diverse group of people believably…

  2. This sounds great!! Margot is a familiar face to many of us bloggers and she must have been very nervous having you review it. It sounds like she has done a great job and I look forward to reading some of her work in the near future 🙂

    • Haha! But I’m always so sweet… except to Ms Hannah, and she deserves it! 😉 Yes, Margot’s done very well with this one – it’s a pity the first two in the series aren’t available on Kindle over here… maybe some day! 🙂

      • Hm – not sure if I agree with ‘always so sweet’ – but always very fair, certainly 😉 Never easy to review a friend’s work, though. I like that she has made her police and detectives competent – a rare pleasure!

        • Haha – thank you! 😉 Yes, I always prefer competent police officers in fiction too – much more believable. For some reason it doesn’t bother me in classic crime when the amateur detective was so much better than the police, but it doesn’t work somehow in modern crime…

          • I agree – although there are undoubtedly some stupid cops about, they generally don’t make it as far as working on murder investigations or major crime. In reality, if they can’t be sacked they get moved somewhere safe very quickly! Classic crime is different as investigations back then were very different and often the amateur sleuth had more skills at their disposal than the actual police. They had better side-kicks back then, too, but that is just a personal opinion 😉

            • Yes, that’s why I can’t really be bothered with the maverick copper either – in the current climate I’m pretty sure mavericks would be booted to one side too if they couldn’t be sacked. I often imagine the court cases when all the beating up of suspects and so on came out – maybe in the ’80s, but not today! I know it must make it harder for authors to have to stick to credibility but books are so much better when they do… but every ‘tec should have a nice sidekick, I agree… 😉

    • I know! This is her third, but the first two weren’t on Kindle and were kinda hard to get hold of over here, so it’s great that this one is more easily available. 🙂

  3. Congrats, Margot, and best wishes for your book’s success! This sounds like a good read, FF, and you’ve done another excellent job reviewing it fairly. That’s something that’s got to be most challenging, talking about a friend’s writing. It’s probably a bit easier, of course, if you actually enjoyed the book!

    • Thanks, Debbie! Ha, yes, I’m always terrified when I start reading something by someone I know, but fortunately I seem to have a lot of talented friends! I still hate reviewing them though… 😉

    • Thank you! Yes, it’s always such a relief when a friend’s book turns out to be good! Me, too – I really prefer the mystery with suspects and clues rather than the all action thriller, though they can sometimes be fun too.

  4. This sounds just the thing for a Christmas read – a good mystery, believable characters and not too much gore – maybe the old-style story rather than the new-style gross-out is finally making a comeback!

  5. Your review helped me more clearly realize why I didn’t like the cozy mystery Terror in Taffeta: she’s an amateur sleuth, so to me her look smart, the police are made very aggressive and unhelpful.

  6. Good to hear you enjoyed this FF as unsurprisingly I also have a copy of this one on my TBR! It sounds great – I do like books with limited suspects and the university setting sounds perfect as over the last couple of years I’ve moved more away from the gruesome back towards the genres roots.

    • Yes, I’m going through a spate of more traditional crime reading too, so this one fits in excellently. And I’m sure you’ll like the present/past aspect of it too. A goodie – enjoy! 😀

Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s