Tuesday ’Tec! The Case of Oscar Brodski by R Austin Freeman

Death of a diamond merchant…

When she read last week’s guest post from Martin Edwards on Ten Top Golden Age Detectives, regular commenter BigSister (who, by an amazing coincidence, is my big sister) mentioned one of her own favourite early mystery writers, R Austin Freeman, and specifically his “inverted mysteries”, a format he apparently pretty much invented. This is a story that starts by showing the crime, including allowing the reader to know the culprit, and then shows how the investigator attempts to solve it. So, since one must always listen to one’s big sister (well, except when she’s praising Vin Diesel films or banging on about fantasy novels), I promptly selected what I think is the first of these stories for this week’s…

Tuesday Tec2

The Case of Oscar Brodski

by R Austin Freeman

.

R Austin Freeman
R Austin Freeman

The first part of the story introduces us to Silas Hickler, a successful burglar with connections to the diamond industry, and a convenient conscience that allows him to commit his crimes without suffering too greatly from remorse.

No one, looking into his cheerful, round face, beaming with benevolence and wreathed in perpetual smiles, would have imagined him to be a criminal. Least of all, his worthy, high-church housekeeper, who was a witness to his unvarying amiability, who constantly heard him carolling light-heartedly about the house and noted his appreciative zest at meal-times.

Peter Copley (right) as Dr Thorndyke 1964
Peter Copley (right) as Dr Thorndyke 1964

One October evening, the aforesaid housekeeper is out and Silas himself is preparing to go on a journey to Amsterdam to sell some dodgy diamonds, when a man stops at his house to ask for directions to the train station. Silas recognises the man immediately as Oscar Brodski, a well-known and reputable diamond merchant. When Silas learns that Brodski is also headed for Amsterdam, he speculates that the merchant is likely to be carrying some valuable diamonds and immediately his greed begins to put ideas into his head. After all, it wouldn’t be the first time…

Crimes against the person he had always looked upon as sheer insanity. There was, it is true, that little affair of the Weybridge policeman, but that was unforeseen and unavoidable, and it was the constable’s doing after all. And there was the old housekeeper at Epsom, too, but, of course, if the old idiot would shriek in that insane fashion…

And so Mr Brodski’s fate is soon sealed…

So, for half-a-minute, he stood motionless, like a symbolical statue of Murder, glaring down with horrible, glittering eyes upon the unconscious diamond merchant, while his quick breath passed without a sound through his open mouth and his fingers writhed slowly like the tentacles of a giant hydra.

John Neville (right) as Dr Thorndyke 1971
John Neville (right) as Dr Thorndyke 1971

* * * * *

Part 2 introduces Dr John Thorndyke and his sidekick, Christopher Jervis, who is our narrator for this section. Thorndyke is a scientific detective, who always carries a case filled with equipment, such as a miniature microscope. He happens to be on a train that is held up by the discovery of a body on the line, decapitated by a passing goods train but still recognisably poor old Brodski. Not convinced that Brodski’s death is accidental, he sets out to investigate…

“In a case of this kind,” he remarked, “we have to decide on one of three possible explanations: accident, suicide or homicide; and our decision will be determined by inferences from three sets of facts: first, the general facts of the case; second, the special data obtained by examination of the body, and, third, the special data obtained by examining the spot on which the body was found.”

With the help of Jervis and his trusty microscope, Thorndyke does exactly that, and, deciding that Brodski was the victim of murder, goes on to track down the perpetrator of the crime.

Barrie Ingham as Dr Thorndyke, 1973 (front, left)
Barrie Ingham as Dr Thorndyke, 1973 (front, left)

* * * * *

Well, I found this thoroughly entertaining! The first section takes us inside the mind of the murderer and has some great melodramatic writing that gives the whole thing an atmosphere of growing horror. By contrast, the second section is written very matter-of-factly, with Thorndyke relying almost entirely on forensic evidence to solve the crime. There are elements of Holmes in Thorndyke’s cerebral, scientific approach, but I would have missed the physical drama that usually livens up the Holmes’ stories, had it not been provided in the first section. Jervis is a much more perceptive sidekick than Watson, and the story hints that he is in fact being trained by Thorndyke to follow his methods rather than simply being a staunch friend. The police are, of course, pretty thick – initially dismissive of Thorndyke’s strange methods and then awestruck by his results.

I enjoyed Freeman’s writing style, especially in the first section, and the forensic stuff holds up well to age and is convincing, with only a couple of moments when Thorndyke seems to make spectacular assumptions based on very little evidence. First published in 1912, Thorndyke ends by suggesting there is an “urgent need of a trained scientist to aid the police” in such cases. From the number of forensic experts infesting modern crime fiction, it appears he got his wish. I look forward to reading more of the Thorndyke stories.

* * * * *

I read the story in this Kindle collection, which I acquired for the vast sum of 49p. It doesn’t seem to be available in the US, but many other similarly priced collections are available. This particular story was originally published in the collection called The Singing Bone, or under the more prosaic US title of The Adventures of Dr Thorndyke.

dr thorndyke mysteriesAmazon UK Link

Alternatively, if you’d like to read it online, here’s a link.

I took the pics from an interesting post on a blog called Ontos, where the various TV incarnations of Dr Thorndyke are discussed.

* * * * *

Little Grey Cells rating: ❓ (it’s not really a mystery in that sense)

Overall story rating:      😀 😀 😀 😀 🙂

33 thoughts on “Tuesday ’Tec! The Case of Oscar Brodski by R Austin Freeman

  1. I liked the hydra part. That’s very descriptive, you know. 49p…is that like 49 pennies? Do you have pennies? Have you ever seen a penny? Sorry, but all those questions just jumped to mind, see.

  2. Ah, the inverted story! It can indeed work well, FIctionFan. I find it particularly interesting that there were two such different writing styles in the first and second parts of the story. If that’s not done very well, it can be jarring. Still, it sounds as though you really enjoyed this story, and I’m glad. See? Listening to Big Sister is sometimes worth the while. 😉

    • Yes, indeed! More recent versions of inverted stories don’t seem to draw such a clear dividing line between the two parts as this did, but I actually thought the two different styles worked quite well. Oh, don’t put ideas in BigSister’s head or she’ll be sending me lists… 😉

  3. This looks great! Very much my sort of thing. I always really enjoyed Columbo (not quite the same, but still) and watched as he gradually closed in on the killer. And this has diamond smuggling of sorts in it! I think Big Sister is a very astute lady indeed. It must run in the family.

    • I think I saw on wiki or somewhere that Columbo is considered to be in this genre of inverted stories. I liked them too, though in general I prefer whodunits. But this was good in that both parts could almost be read separately. Oh, don’t praise her – it’ll only go to her head! I’m very astute though… 😉

      • I prefer a traditional whodunit, but this makes for a nice change. Also I don’t have to think too much about who the killer might be 🙂 And then there’s always the opportunity to say ‘…Just one more thing,’ just when the killer thinks he’s off the hook 🙂
        You are superly astute, I agree!!

  4. Well, thank goodness you liked this one – recommending old detective stories is always such a risk, but you really can’t go wrong with Thorndyke.

  5. This sounds fun! I always find it hokey when we see a murder but not the person who committed it in the beginning of books and movies. In this case, did the murderer show up in the detective’s search before the detective knows he’s the murderer? There’s always the fun of watching the killer shaking in his booties, or fearing for the detective’s safety the company of a still-masked murderer!!

  6. Another one that sounds fascinating! And as a “big sister” myself, I’m very supportive of your idea that big sisters should be listened to (my little sis never listens to me, ha!!)

  7. I love the sound of this – what a great idea to have the two parts to the tale so clearly divided. So much cleaner than the hopping backwards and forwards reading gymnastics so many authors expect us to do nowadays 😉 and I do love the word zest – I’m determined to use it today!

    • I was thinking that too – about the jumping back and forwards. This worked much better, I think, because you could get totally involved in each part – with modern ones half the time I’m lost! 😉 Haha! No cheating with lemon-based recipes now!

Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s