Film of the Book: Green for Danger

Directed by Sidney Gilliat (1946)

 

Green-for-Danger-1
Alastair Sim as a rather wicked Inspector Cockrill

From the book review:

World War 2 is underway and a military hospital has been set up at Heron’s Park in Kent. As the book begins, the local postman is taking a bundle of letters to the hospital from seven people confirming acceptance of positions they’ve been offered there. These seven people will become the chief suspects when a patient at the hospital dies unexpectedly on the operating table. At first, it’s assumed the death was no more than an unusual reaction to the anaesthetic, but when Inspector Cockrill is called in to confirm this, he learns a couple of things that lead him to suspect the death may have been murder. But before he can find out who did it, he first has to work out how it was done…

You can read the full book review by clicking here.

 

Film of the Book

 

In my review of the book, I praised the characterisation, fiendish plotting, multitude of red herrings, and the authentic feel of a military hospital operating during the Blitz. I also criticised it a little for being too drawn out towards the end. So these were the things for which I was particularly looking out when watching the film.

With a fairly short running time of just on an hour and a half, the film necessarily has to do quite a bit of squeezing to get the whole thing in. And with a major talent like Alastair Sim in the role of Inspector Cockrill, it isn’t surprising that he becomes the central focus. First off, the film cuts two characters out completely, moving their actions onto other characters. I must say the writers do this seamlessly so that, if I hadn’t been making a direct comparison, I doubt I’d have noticed that anything was missing. It does have the effect of removing one of my favourite red herrings, though – the one I thought for about half the book was going to be the real motive – but on the upside, it also removes a bit of romantic hoohah that had felt contrived and unrealistic in the book, so the seesaw remains pretty balanced.

They all look so innocent, don't they?
They all look so innocent, don’t they?

In the book, the suspects’ characterisation is very well developed. These seven people have all become friends and, in some cases, lovers, and each person is so well drawn that the reader cares about what happens to them. In the film, the characterisation is much more superficial – in fact, for a good half of it I was continually mixing up two of the women, since they hadn’t properly developed as “people”. In a sense, they feel more like chess-pieces being shoved around to move the plot along. Again, though, without comparison, this works fine – the film pushes on at a fairly frantic pace from event to event, making it more of a fun roller-coaster mystery thriller.

Green for Danger 5

Cockrill becomes a kind of comedy character, as you’d expect with Alastair Sim playing him, but retains the intelligence he shows in the book, and adds a whole layer of rather wicked cruelty to the role, thoroughly enjoying how miserable and scared he’s making all the suspects. I thoroughly enjoyed it, too, I must admit! It’s an excellent performance – he doesn’t overplay it to the extent that it becomes farce, but it certainly changes the tone to being much more humorous than the book, which does take away a little from the depth of it, I felt.

The standard of acting throughout is pretty good, although there was quite a lot of “eye-acting” going on – startled looks, suspicious glances, narrowed eyes etc. Since all the actors were at it, I assume it was a directorial decision. It made me laugh, but it all added to the melodrama. Trevor Howard and Leo Genn, as Dr Barnes and Dr Eden, are both excellent as two men interested in the same nurse, Esther. Poor “Barney” is deeply in love and wildly jealous, while for Dr Eden the whole thing is meaningless – he’s just enjoying winding Barney up. One of the funniest scenes in the film is when they eventually come to blows, and Alastair Sims pulls up a chair to sit and watch.

Nurse Woods, “Woody”, was my favourite character in the book, and while I enjoyed Megs Jenkins’ performance, the writers had removed all the underlying pathos from her character, leaving only a rather sensible school-marm type behind. Judy Campbell plays Sister Bates as a kind of semi-demented, jealousy-ravaged maniac, slightly over the top, but a good deal of fun. The other two women, Sally Gray and Rosamund John, didn’t register highly for me, partly because of the way their parts were written, and partly because I found the performances weren’t as strong as the others.

Oooh, creepy!
Oooh, creepy!

Overall, the book has far more depth of characterisation and gets the war-time atmosphere over much better, both of which add a lot of moral ambiguity to the motivation which the film misses entirely. However, I enjoyed the film loads. It sticks pretty closely to the plot and keeps enough of the red herrings to make it a proper mystery. It’s much faster paced, and Sim’s performance adds greatly to the jollity making the whole thing feel like a real romp! One I will undoubtedly watch again when I need something light and thoroughly entertaining.

.

★ ★ ★ ★

.

And, finally

The Winner in the Book v Film Battle is…

 

green for danger.

 

THE BOOK!

 

 

28 thoughts on “Film of the Book: Green for Danger

  1. How can I not give a cheer for the book as winner. Particularly as I really am rather tempted to read it, following your review. O should I say review of book and comparison review. Especially as I’m intrigued to discover your favourite red herring (though I might have to watch the film as well to spot its vanishing. So, is that herring decorated with fried tomato, herring liberally coated with red pepper relish? Herring and beetroot?

    I know, I know, I’ll just have to get the book

  2. Haven’t seen this one, but it sounds highly entertaining. Of course, I haven’t read the book, either, so I have nothing concrete to go on there. Still, I do love a good mystery, and it’s great to find one that adheres to the standards (red herrings and all!). And what a naturally creepy setting a hospital can be!! Thanks for the recommendation, FF.

  3. I admit, FoctionFan, that I haven’t seen the film. But from your excellent description, I can imagine the changes you’re describing. I think I would probably prefer the Cockrill of the book, who’s got less of a comic touch. But still, it sounds as though this is a solid adaptation of the book. And the changes don’t seem to have really detracted from the guts of the story.

    • Yes, the book has more depth all round – but the film is great fun! It does stick pretty closely to the original plot, but has to cut a lot of the background to fit the length. But Sim gives a great performance even if he’s not exactly like the Cockrill in the book. 🙂

    • It’s afternoon on a duvet-day watching… purely light entertainment, which meant the eye-acting was fun. Well, it made me laugh anyway… not sure whether it was supposed to… 😉

  4. I really want to read this author’s books, so I’m glad the book trumps the movie. By the way, I didn’t know she was the author of the Nurse Matilda stories.

    • Ooh, I don’t know the Nurse Matilda books at all, but looking at them I see they were apparently what Nanny McPhee was based on – they sound like fun! I’ll certainly be looking out for more of her detective stuff. Can’t think why she’s become semi-forgotten…

  5. No, no! Isn’t fair. I call for a re-thingy. See…what would happen if you watched the movie first then read the book? It might be the other way around, I say.

    Sally Gray! Aha, the last name is spelled right.

    • It might be! That’s what happened with One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest – I loved the film so much I really disliked the book. But I think with this one the book would still have won…

      *shakes head sadly* Poor woman! She must have suffered going all through life with a misspelled name…

  6. “Hoohah”!! Okay, now I can’t tell if you’re adding in totally delicious words just to please the like of me, or if you’re the kind of person who says hoohah and woo woo in real life! Either way, I love your reviews. 😀

Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s