All stand please…
…for this year’s nominees and winners of the annual FictionFan Awards of 2015.
In case you missed them last week, here’s a quick résumé of the rules…
THE CRITERIA
.
All nominees must be books I’ve read and reviewed between November 2014 and October 2015 regardless of publication date, but excluding re-reads. The books must have received a 5-star rating.
THE CATEGORIES
.
There will be Honourable Mentions and a Winner in each of the following categories
Genre Fiction – click to see awards
Factual
Crime Fiction/Thrillers
Literary Fiction
.
…and…
Book of the Year 2015
THE PRIZES
.
For the winners!
.
I guarantee to read the author’s next book even if I have to buy it myself!
(NB If an author is unlikely to publish another book due to being dead, I will read a book from his/her back catalogue…)
For the runners-up!
.
Nothing!
THE JUDGES
.
Me!
* * * * * * * * *
So, without further ado, here are this year’s runners-up and winner in
FACTUAL
.
This is a Golden Age for factual writing, especially in history and science, with authors reaching out beyond the academic market to make their books accessible to the general reader. The result is that it’s almost impossible to decide which should win since each of the books mentioned below deserves an award in its own field – it’s a bit of a comparing apples and oranges situation. However, the judges have emerged from their lengthy deliberation and a winner has been chosen…
HONOURABLE MENTIONS
The Telegraph Book of the First World War edited by Gavin Fuller
.
This book brings together a selection of the news reports and articles printed in The Telegraph during the First World War, at a time when for most people their daily newspaper was their only source of information. The quality of the writing itself is astonishingly high, filled with passion and poignancy, and sometimes reaching towards poetry. There are articles from literary figures here, such as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Rudyard Kipling, but it’s the reports from the professional journalists that have most impact. No dry reporting of facts and figures here – these are vivid word pictures that evoked a whole range of emotions in me, sorrow, anger, horror, grief and, more unexpectedly, pride, admiration, and a fierce desire to see the Allies win. I found it fascinating, absorbing and moving, and it has given me a real feeling for what it must have been like for the people left at home, desperate for news, and totally dependent on the brave men who put themselves in danger to tell the story of the war.
* * * * * * * * *
Huck Finn’s America by Andrew Levy
.
Bravo to Andrew Levy! Literary criticism has long been the most jargon-filled, pretentious and badly written of all the factual fields (in my opinion, of course) but Levy has broken the mould with this immensely readable criticism of Twain’s acclaimed masterpiece. Part biography and part history, Levy sets the book firmly back into his context, stripping back much of the mythology that has grown up around it since its first appearance. His contention is that one must understand the social culture at the time of writing to make sense of Twain’s portrayals of both Huck and Jim. He discusses ‘bad boy’ culture, the status of black people thirty years after emancipation, and Twain’s nostalgia for the minstrel shows of his youth, and shows how each fed into the book. A great read – well researched, clearly structured, convincingly argued and best of all written in normal language rather than lit-crit gobbledegook. A template for others in the field to follow.
* * * * * * * * *
The Churchill Factor by Boris Johnson read by Simon Shepherd
.
In this book, Boris Johnson sets out to try to discover what made Churchill into the man who is considered to have been crucial in the British war effort. He does this with his usual panache, making the book hugely enjoyable and filled with humour, which doesn’t disguise the massive amount of research and knowledge that has clearly gone into it. He makes it crystal clear that he admires Churchill intensely and, because he’s so open about it, his bias in the great man’s favour comes over as wholly endearing. The book is nearly as revealing about Boris as Churchill and, given that he’s one of our major politicians who might well be Prime Minister one day, it’s an intriguing insight into the things he admires, and presumably would want to emulate, in a leader. And on top of all that it’s read by Simon Shepherd, owner of one of the loveliest voices in the world. I have happy memories of going to bed each night with Winston, Boris and Simon – more fun than you might think! If I had a category for audiobook of the year, this would win easily.
* * * * * * * * *
Resurrection Science by M. R. O’Connor
.
In a period called by scientists the ‘Sixth Extinction’, the question of conservation has never been more relevant or immediate. But what exactly are we conserving for? What are the moral, ethical and philosophical questions that surround the various types of conservation? In this excellent book, M.R. O’Connor highlights some of the species on the edge of extinction and uses them as jumping off points to look at some of the arguments, from the practical to the esoteric, that surround the whole question of species conservation. From Northern white rhinos and the effects of war, to the panther in the south-eastern USA and its impact on the American character and psyche, the book is stuffed to bursting point with the most current thinking on the ethics of conservation, all written in an immensely readable and accessible way. Without exception, the most interesting and wide-ranging book on the subject I have ever read and so nearly this year’s winner.
* * * * * * * * *
FICTIONFAN AWARD WINNER 2015
for
BEST FACTUAL
John Knox by Jane Dawson
.
In Scotland, John Knox is thought of as a misogynistic, hellfire-and-damnation preaching old killjoy, who is responsible for the fairly joyless version of Protestantism that has blighted our country for hundreds of years. Father of the Scottish Reformation, he is notorious for being the author of ‘The First Blast of the Trumpet against the Monstrous Regiment of Women’. In this new biography, Jane Dawson sets out, not so much to overturn this impression of Knox, but to show that there was more to him than this. She sheds a great deal of light on this complex and important figure, showing in depth how his interpretation of the Bible influenced every aspect of his life. She also widens the subject out to put the Scottish Reformation into context with the Protestant movement throughout Europe, showing how, despite some internal differences, there was an attempt to unify the theology and forms of worship of the fledgling religion. And she goes on to show how local circumstances led to variations in the practices of Reformed churches in different nations.
Dawson writes very well, with no unnecessary academic jargon, making the book an enjoyable read. In structure, it’s a straightforward biography following a linear timeline. Though I knew most of the historical ‘facts’ already, I certainly have a better understanding of the man, and of the Church he was so instrumental in creating. An excellent biography and history combined, this has been shortlisted for the Saltire Society Scottish History Book of the Year award. My fingers are crossed…
(I just want be clear that the award is going to Jane Dawson and not in any way to that misogynistic old killjoy, Knox. 😉 )
* * * * * * * * *
Nicely-chosen, FictionFan. As I look back over your nominees, I have to agree that this has been a good year for factual books. And what impresses me is the range of books you’ve read – on all sorts of different topics. And don’t worry; in no way do I take your post as an endorsement of Knox’s point of view… 😉
LikeLike
Yes, I’ve probably read fewer factual books this year, partly because so many of them have been huge bricks, but the quality has been consistently high. Haha! Poor old Knox! But I certainly can’t promise to be reading his next book, though I will read Jane Dawson’s… 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, here’s the thing: If I had to fight in the first World War, I would’ve been a pilot, I think. Rather than a chap in the trenches. Just because.
I didn’t really know literary criticism was a thing, but I’m digging it. I should write a book of literary criticism, I’m thinking.
I wonder what Churchill was feeling (or looking at) when he took that photo. *considers*
LikeLike
More glamorous, yes, but possibly even more dangerous! No, I don’t think I’d have let you fight at all…
*laughs and laughs* You should!! That would be amazing! So long as you don’t even think about doing Ms Austen…
I think somebody must have threatened to take his champagne away…
LikeLike
But then imagine! All the people would throw things at me. I’d be like the Red Barron. Only…I’d be in a Black plane.
But of course that’s what I must do! I’m like her greatest critic. Everyone would hate me. No one is brave enough to touch her, see.
Or maybe his stomach was hurting.
LikeLike
Why black?
But that means you’d have to read the books…
*laughs* Perhaps! Or maybe somebody had stamped on his foot.
LikeLike
Black’s scarier, you must admit.
Haha, very good point. Hmm. Rats. I’m stuck, the sudden.
With a steel-tipped boot!
LikeLike
I suppose… but it would need to have the Professorial coat of arms on the wings…
Never mind – you’ll feel so much better once you’ve read them. *nods confidently*
Poor old Winnie!
LikeLike
You know, the sudden, I’ve decided my coat of arms is…a short sword crossed by a katana. *wide eyes* That’s cool.
Have you read P&P and Zombies?
LikeLike
That is cool! Mine will be a peashooter crossed wth a pink blancmange.
No! But I’ll read it at the same time as you read Northanger Abbey…
LikeLike
Speaking of misogynistic, hellfire-and-damnation preaching old killjoy, I should read something more about Calvin, the scourge and killjoy of Geneva, whose influence can still be felt in that town.
LikeLike
Haha! Yes, you can kinda understand why Calvin and Knox were pals, can’t you? Now there’s a party I wouldn’t have wanted to crash! I should be reading one on Martin Luther soon – but I have the impression he might have been a bit more of a charmer…
LikeLike
Congrats to the winner, though I was hoping Resurrection Science would win. 🙂 But Jane Dawson put in a good effort.
LikeLike
Resurrection Science so nearly won – I swayed back and forwards for ages before picking Knox. But any of these could have won easily – it was a difficult choice…
LikeLike
The main problem with Knox must have been that he was around before chocolate was freely available. If ever there was a picture of what someone with a bad case of piles might look like……… The odd spoonful of honey and access to Hotel Chocolat’s finest dark chocolate enrobing a whisky filled centre might have made him see the world quite, quite differently.
But you are right to let Jane have the chocolate prize which I’m sure you are sending her unless of course you need to eat it yourself to ensure someone isn’t trying to poison her through jealousy – that’ll be one of the unsuccessful nominees, no doubt.
Well judged, and deliberated upon with the other judges (Tommy and Tuppence?)
LikeLike
Great description of Knox. And most of the other “reformers.”
LikeLike
Haha! They weren’t the cheeriest bunch of chaps, were they?
LikeLiked by 1 person
But they sure did mess people up.
LikeLike
Still do! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh dear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely the man needed something – either chocolate or a bag over his head, I haven’t quite decided! Mind you, dealing with that beard would be enough to depress anyone – imagine how different the world might have been if he’d been in Vine and got a constant supply of shavers…
Give the winner chocolate?! Goodness, no! I’m hoping that in time the nominees will realise I’m easy to bribe and start sending me chocolate! I suspect that must be how they pick the Booker…
Just me and my other personalities…
LikeLike
Great nominations here this year. Good to see the Telegraph book which I have dipped in and out of ever since being compelled to buy a copy following your review!
LikeLike
It’s been a great year for factual stuff! Oh, I’m glad you’re enjoying the Telegraph book. I had to read it straight through because I got a review copy, but it’s really an ideal one for dipping in and out of…
LikeLike
Well, I haven’t read a single one of these!! Each, in its own way, sounds interesting, though — probably because you’re just such an outstanding reviewer, FF!!
LikeLike
Aw, thanks, Debbie! It’s always easy to review the good books though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m very glad I didn’t have to pick one of these. So far, I’ve only read the Knox, which was excellent, but I’m hoping (hint! hint!) that the Telegraph might fall out of Santa’s sack in my direction! 🙂
LikeLike
Hint noted and forwarded to Santa! An excellent choice. Glad to hear the Knox is up for the Saltire prize – I haven’t read any of the other contenders, but it must be in woth a good shout, I’d think…
LikeLike