Identical by Scott Turow

“We came into the world like brother and brother…”

😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

identicalThe lives of the Kronos and Gianis families have been entangled for decades, first as friends and then divided by a feud that has lasted for over twenty years. But when the Gianis boys – identical twins Cass and Paul – grow up, Cass falls in love with Dita, daughter of the head of the Kronos family, a man who calls himself Zeus. During a picnic at which both families are present, Dita is killed and a few days later Cass confesses to the crime.

The book has a double time-line. The main one takes place in 2008 and begins just as Cass is about to be released from prison. The events of the day of the picnic in 1982 are told in flashback, in occasional chapters cut into the main narrative. By 2008, Zeus has been long dead, and the Kronos business empire is now headed by his son Hal. Hal has never been satisfied that the full story of his sister’s death has been told and publicly accuses Cass’s twin, Paul, of having been involved. Paul is campaigning to become mayor and is left with little option but to sue for slander, which he does, but with great reluctance. Hal tasks Evon Miller with the job of seeking evidence to back up his accusation.

“After Cass was sentenced, Paul was in actual physical agony for weeks at the prospect of their separation. But they had adjusted to life apart. People adjust to loss. And now he found dealing with Cass every day, and the similar ways their minds worked, with the same lapses and backflips, often unsettling. He had forgotten this part, how it inevitably felt like they were opponents on an indoor court, basketball or squash players, throwing their back ends at each other as they fought for position.”

There’s much less courtroom stuff in this than in most of Turow’s earlier books, and there’s been a bit of a generational shift in the characters. We catch brief glimpses of the old guard – Raymond Horgan and Sandy Stern both put in cameo appearances – but the focus of the book is on the investigation carried out by Evon and ex-cop Tim Brodie, both on the payroll of Hal’s firm. Evon is an ex-FBI agent who first appeared in, I think, Personal Injuries. Through the feuding families, Turow takes us into the Greek community of Kindle County – a close-knit group of immigrants and their descendants, holding to old traditions, and with bonds and enmities that are passed down through the generations.

Turow’s skill is in telling a story slowly, concentrating on each character in turn and giving a complete picture of them. Here he shows us Evon, struggling still in middle-age to find love and acceptance and dealing with a relationship that has reached breaking point. Through Tim and a couple of the oldest of the Greek immigrants, he looks with great empathy and insight at how differently aging can affect people. Love is a major theme in the book – family love, romantic love, lost love and, not least, the unique bond that binds the twins so closely that sometimes it is as if they are two parts of the same identity.

“All in all, his wife was the kindest person he had ever known – love seldom left her and she had filled their house with love like light. But in dying she became ornery and sharp-tongued, and frequently raised her voice to him, telling him that whatever he did was not right. It was a grief impossible to bear at the time, the raw unfairness that she had to die and leave as final memories ones of her being somebody else.”

The investigation rests mainly on forensic evidence, with the now familiar story of advances in DNA technology that make it possible to revisit old crimes. By a third of the way through, I was convinced I knew what had happened. By halfway through, that idea was blown out of the water, but again I felt I was on the right track and partially I was. However the end, when it came, did surprise me – but this isn’t really a thriller in the sense of a big explosive action-packed climax. With Turow, it’s more thoughtful than that – more of a concentration on the impact of the people involved and of the legacy in broken lives. I have long considered that Turow writes literary fiction rather than thrillers and this book strengthens that view.

Scott Turow
Scott Turow

I don’t think this is Turow’s best plotted novel, but as always loved the quality of his writing and the depth of his characterisation. Oddly, the weakest characters for me were the twins themselves and I found the resolution of their part of the story stretched my credibility a bit more than I like. But the Greek theme was handled very well, giving a genuine feel to this community within a larger society. And I loved the concentration on the older age-group – it means these characters have fully-finished lives; they are who they are, not what they might become. Although this is not, for me, Turow’s absolute best it is nonetheless an excellent book: thoughtful, a little nostalgic and of course beautifully written. Highly recommended.

NB This book was provided for review by the publisher, Grand Central Publishing.

Amazon UK Link
Amazon USLink

22 thoughts on “Identical by Scott Turow

  1. FictionFan – Oh, no doubt at all that Turow has quite a lot of skill at creating deep, complex and interesting characters. One’s invited to see them as absolutely real people. And that takes effort and talent I think. And I know what you mean about Turow’s writing style. You’re not the only one who’s mentioned seeing him as more a literary writer than anything else.


    • I like the way he has characters recurring but not always in the main roles. It gives a kind of continuity to the books, and lets us get to know how the characters evolve over time. A great writer!


  2. The major theme is love, though… How horrid. Oh well. Mr. Scott looks too sweet, anyway.

    I found the storyline–as you presented it–grabbing and, interestingly, complex. The professor likes complex stories. I do think they’re going extinct–like the Tassie Devil.

    As always, an awesome review!


    • 😆 Definitely Tom! I think he looks lovely – I’d never seen him till I started looking for images and he’s nothing like I expected.

      His storylines are always complex and he takes the time to tell the story properly. If you haven’t read him before, you should really add one of his books to your TBR… 😉

      Thank you, dear C-W-W! 😀


      • Hmm…not sure what to think. I’m sure any sensible person would feel that way. You see, he looked *too sweet*, not lovely. Ooo, but let’s hope he has a really vicious side…

        Really? I’m getting too many books on this list. How about FEF reads for the professor and imparts to him all the good stuff and leaves the horrid things out? That sounds like a great idea. I bet I could cover over 500 books a year that way.


        • Darby would probably agree with you. He is lovely – look at that well-groomed facial hair! And his twinkly smile! He’ll definitely be in my end-of-year round-up of most gorgeous authors…

          😆 Not quite 500! You’re confusing me with BigSister, I think! But since I won’t give away the ending, you’ll just get frustrated…much better to read them (all) yourself…


          • You’re right, he probably would. As a matter of fact, from what this professor’s read of Darby, we’d probably get on. Interesting. But I would tease him worse than the Bingley thing.

            😆 A twinky smile? 😆 I do hope you don’t have something like that, do you? You better not, young lady!

            A rejection–how horrid. One day the professor will hire someone to read for him, for sure. (I’m sure BigSister puts away 1000.)


            • I think so too – and furthermore I think you’d both get on well with Rafa, too. Darby improves when he’s teased…

              😆 Well, I was only toying with the idea, but your reaction tells me it’s a must!! Now should I allow people to vote or will I just pick my own favourite…hmm!

              Not a rejection – never! Just an encouragement! 😉 I think you’re probably about right re BigSister – I’m thinking of setting up a competition between her and Lady Fancifull. But I wouldn’t know which to bet on…


            • The professor doesn’t know no fool named Rafa. The professor–I’ve heard–is preparing to do a second ripio review of P&P!

              Hmm…wickedness. I hope you’re joking. You are, aren’t you? (But if you aren’t, definitely a vote.)

              That’s what most people say about their rejections. The professor would bet on BigSister…


            • Rafa is no fool – he plays a sensible sport!

              Thanks for the advance warning. The Professor won’t mind – I hope – if I skip my visit to the PL that day. As I’ve said, I’ve had enough Austen-hate to last well into my next life. But you and your fellow book-haters – Enjoy!

              Haha! I think it’s a great idea! And I already know who’s most likely to win the FF Award – the People’s Choice Award might surprise me though…

              I think it’d be a close contest….maybe you could hire BigSister to read for you?


            • He does! I love tennis.

              (The professor caught a lot of hate for ripping it last time. It might not be safe to try again.)

              Interestingly enough, so do I. (Can you cheat and tell me?)

              Oh, I’m sure she wouldn’t agree to read for this ninja rat–or whatever kind of rat I am.


    • I’m amazed you haven’t read Turow – he’s one of my favourite authors…and gratifyingly non-prolific! He dips occasionally but even his less good ones are better than most of what’s out there. And thank you!


  3. I haven’t read any of his work, so I just looked him up on Wikipedia. The man must be one of those people who never sleep, he’s accomplished so much. And I had no idea that he is considered so literary. That’s what I get for making snap judgments about the mass market displays I pass in the airport bookstores. What do you think is his best book?


    • I think the one that made me realise his real claim to be a ‘literary’ writer was ‘Burden of Proof’. I was blown away by it. But if you were thinking of reading them, I’d really start with his first ‘Presumed Innocent’ since many of the characters travel along throughout all of the books, though different ones get the spotlight each time. (You could read any of them as a standalone though, except ‘Innocent’, which is a follow-up to ‘Presumed Innocent’.)

      The first couple were more legal thrillery but still much deeper than that genre usually goes. Although he is variable, it’s within narrow limits – I don’t think I’ve ever read anything of his that I wouldn’t rate as at least ‘very good’.


Please leave a comment - I'd love to know who's visiting and what you think...of the post, of the book, of the blog, of life, of chocolate...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.